I was more referring to having to deal with them personally. I would rather have to sit and listen to a Bible Thumper (not from WBC though) than an zealous atheist.
When it comes to government, I really do not care what a person's beliefs (or non-beliefs) are, so long as they do not try to force those beliefs (or non-beliefs) on others through legislation. On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]>wrote: > > I can see that. I tend to view it the opposite way because the bible > thumpers tend to have a concrete impact on my life (see marriage equality > laws, prayer in school, buying liquor on Sunday, lack of coverage for birth > control in health plans, etc) whereas militant atheists tend to be fairly > harmless cranks. If Atheists were running government and trying to clamp > down on otherwise chill religious folks, I'd probably feel the other way > around. > > Cheers, > Judah > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > See Jerry And Cam's replies. They did a much better job explaining why > than > > I ever could have hoped. > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Out of curiosity, why do you find them less palatable? > > > > > > Judah > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I find 'extreme' atheists to be less palatable than even the most > > ardent > > > > Bible thumpers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:361121 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
