Would a creationist's opinion on "valid science" carry more or less weight than my dog's opinion on quantum physics?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > It does. However, the creationists don't believe carbon dating is > valid science. > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:51 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Doesn't carbon dating prove the planet is more than 6000 years old? > > On Mar 28, 2013 4:49 PM, "Maureen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Has he defined what he would accept as proof? If not, the game is > >> rigged worse than an off-strip Vegas casino. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362180 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
