Most anti-evolutionist either don't accept carbon dating, says that there used to be much more carbon 14 back in biblical times. The decay rate of c14 changed significantly since creation.
Take your pick. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:51 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > Doesn't carbon dating prove the planet is more than 6000 years old? > On Mar 28, 2013 4:49 PM, "Maureen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Has he defined what he would accept as proof? If not, the game is >> rigged worse than an off-strip Vegas casino. >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > "That contradicts the headline which says he is willing to give 10K. >> That's >> > just him placing a bet that he is right." >> > >> > >> > At least he's willing to put some skin in the game, unlike others . . . >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362238 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
