explaining that to you in the present environment would constitute a
thought crime. See Matthew Keyes for example.


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Like?
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
>
> On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I thnk there are much bigger concerns than just not doing anythiing
> illegal
> > online.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I don't like it but it's too late to do anything about that now. I just
> >> make sure I'm not doing anything illegal online. I never did anyway so
> it's
> >> not like I had to change my behavior.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>
> >> On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> the thing i find interesting is that the people against background
> checks
> >>> are usually completely indifferent to all their online activity being
> >>> shared with NSA. Bot sure if that's Bruce, but there really does seem
> to
> >> be
> >>> a type of political correctness at work here.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The letters mean go f**k yourself.
> >>>>
> >>>> Who is to say they lied? Whose to say at some time in the future this
> >>>> extensive set of background checks would in fact turn into some kind
> of
> >> big
> >>>> brother type of gun registration?
> >>>>
> >>>> And answer this. How would any bill like this have prevented Adam
> Lanza
> >>>> from doing what he did? The guns belonged to his mother, not him. All
> >>>> extensive background check would accomplish is to make it more
> difficult
> >>>> for honest law abiding citizens from owning guns. And we all know that
> >>>> criminals or potential criminals will not abide by this as they
> >> currently
> >>>> don't abide by the laws we have in place now. I have no issues with
> >>>> registering the guns I have. In fact, it's in my best interest to do
> so
> >>>> since if my gun is stolen I can go in and report it as such so that if
> >> its
> >>>> used in a crime I won't be held responsible for it. However if they
> are
> >>>> going to dig deeper into my background, thus taking it longer to
> >> purchase a
> >>>> gun, I am not for it. I am a law abiding citizen and I don't feel I
> >> have to
> >>>> be subjected to having my background dug deeper into.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 18, 2013, at 8:11 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't know what those letters stand for.....but I guess i just
> have a
> >>>>> simple question: If the gun lobby feels it has the constitution and
> the
> >>>>> majority of Americans on its' side....why resort to lying?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Three letters for him and all the anti-gun activists. GFY!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> President Obama angrily blamed the defeat Wednesday of his
> >> centerpiece
> >>>>>>> gun-control proposal on lies spread by the National Rifle
> >>>>>>> Association<
> >>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-rifle-association/>,
> >>>>>>> calling it “a pretty shameful day for Washington.”
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> “The gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill,” Mr.
> >> Obama
> >>>>>>> said in the White House
> >>>>>>> <http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/white-house/> rose
> >>>>>>> garden about 90 minutes after the vote. “It came down to politics.”
> >>
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/17/obama-denounces-gun-rights-groups-willful-liars/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The gun lobby is probably full of liars.  That would put it on par
> >> with
> >>>>>>> 99.9% of all other lobbies.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What gets me is the gall of President Obama to get up and say
> someone
> >>>>>> else
> >>>>>>> willfully lied about a bill.  That is bold considering President
> >>>> Obama's
> >>>>>>> track record.
> >>>>>>> J
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I’ve pledged that I will not sign health insurance reform — as
> badly
> >>>> as I
> >>>>>>> think it’s necessary, I won’t sign it if that reform adds even one
> >> dime
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> our deficit. - Barrack Obama
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you make less than a quarter of a million dollars a year, you
> will
> >>>> not
> >>>>>>> see a single dime of your taxes go up. If you make $200,000 a year
> or
> >>>>>> less,
> >>>>>>> your taxes will go down. - Bara
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362973
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to