I think we are, but that's a different thread.

.


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> apparently not.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:01 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Some people aren't as aware of wire tap type abuses than we are :)
> > On Apr 18, 2013 10:19 AM, "Dana" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > the thing i find interesting is that the people against background
> checks
> > > are usually completely indifferent to all their online activity being
> > > shared with NSA. Bot sure if that's Bruce, but there really does seem
> to
> > be
> > > a type of political correctness at work here.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The letters mean go f**k yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Who is to say they lied? Whose to say at some time in the future this
> > > > extensive set of background checks would in fact turn into some kind
> of
> > > big
> > > > brother type of gun registration?
> > > >
> > > > And answer this. How would any bill like this have prevented Adam
> Lanza
> > > > from doing what he did? The guns belonged to his mother, not him. All
> > > > extensive background check would accomplish is to make it more
> > difficult
> > > > for honest law abiding citizens from owning guns. And we all know
> that
> > > > criminals or potential criminals will not abide by this as they
> > currently
> > > > don't abide by the laws we have in place now. I have no issues with
> > > > registering the guns I have. In fact, it's in my best interest to do
> so
> > > > since if my gun is stolen I can go in and report it as such so that
> if
> > > its
> > > > used in a crime I won't be held responsible for it. However if they
> are
> > > > going to dig deeper into my background, thus taking it longer to
> > > purchase a
> > > > gun, I am not for it. I am a law abiding citizen and I don't feel I
> > have
> > > to
> > > > be subjected to having my background dug deeper into.
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 18, 2013, at 8:11 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what those letters stand for.....but I guess i just
> > have a
> > > > > simple question: If the gun lobby feels it has the constitution and
> > the
> > > > > majority of Americans on its' side....why resort to lying?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Three letters for him and all the anti-gun activists. GFY!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> President Obama angrily blamed the defeat Wednesday of his
> > > centerpiece
> > > > >>> gun-control proposal on lies spread by the National Rifle
> > > > >>> Association<
> > > > >> http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-rifle-association/
> >,
> > > > >>> calling it “a pretty shameful day for Washington.”
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> “The gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill,” Mr.
> > > Obama
> > > > >>> said in the White House
> > > > >>> <http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/white-house/> rose
> > > > >>> garden about 90 minutes after the vote. “It came down to
> politics.”
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/17/obama-denounces-gun-rights-groups-willful-liars/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The gun lobby is probably full of liars.  That would put it on
> par
> > > with
> > > > >>> 99.9% of all other lobbies.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What gets me is the gall of President Obama to get up and say
> > someone
> > > > >> else
> > > > >>> willfully lied about a bill.  That is bold considering President
> > > > Obama's
> > > > >>> track record.
> > > > >>> J
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> -
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I’ve pledged that I will not sign health insurance reform — as
> > badly
> > > > as I
> > > > >>> think it’s necessary, I won’t sign it if that reform adds even
> one
> > > dime
> > > > >> to
> > > > >>> our deficit. - Barrack Obama
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> If you make less than a quarter of a million dollars a year, you
> > will
> > > > not
> > > > >>> see a single dime of your taxes go up. If you make $200,000 a
> year
> > or
> > > > >> less,
> > > > >>> your taxes will go down. - Bara
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362988
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to