Intent? Act?
Victim? On Jun 4, 2013 8:31 AM, "LRS Scout" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes i am. > > Unless visibly improved or actually causing a negligent event I don't see > a crime > On Jun 4, 2013 8:29 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> The breathalyzer laws have been held up in court as constitutional >> multiple >> times. >> >> Moreover when the law states that the definition of intoxication is .08% >> BAC, and the only ways to measure BAC is an invasive blood sample or >> breathing into a tube (less invasive than fingerprints for that matter), >> what you're advocating is making the drunken driving laws meaningless. >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:53 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > I don't even agree with breathalyzers or blood draws >> > On Jun 4, 2013 7:51 AM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > That's cool. A libertarian on another list had the same viewpoint. I >> can >> > > see the argument. >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:43 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > I do >> > > > >> > > > No collection until conviction. >> > > > On Jun 4, 2013 7:40 AM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Do you oppose taking fingerprints, or any other type of >> identifiable >> > > > data, >> > > > > from people who have been arrested, but not charged? >> > > > > >> > > > > it seems to me like it should be all or nothing. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:35 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Because you can plant manufactured DNA. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > No to mention what markers are they eventually going to be >> looking >> > > for? >> > > > > > On Jun 4, 2013 7:29 AM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Been discussing this on another list....and i guess my >> question >> > is >> > > > > this: >> > > > > > > What's different about taking fingerprints and taking DNA? >> They >> > > > > > fingerprint >> > > > > > > arrestees....which gives them identifiable information which >> can >> > be >> > > > > used >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > > link them to other crimes. How is taking DNA with an equally >> > > > > unobtrusive >> > > > > > > method any different? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:29 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected] >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > No room for abuse there at all..... >> > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 2013 11:41 PM, "Cameron Childress" < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-06/us-supreme-court-rules-dna-testing-legal-search >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Annnnnddd...... >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Discuss. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -Cameron >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ... >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:364145 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
