Since when did you need facts? .
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Zaphod <[email protected]> wrote: > > and 97% of the "info" on wattsupwiththat.com holds no basis in fact. > > > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I ridiculed this junk science back when it came out. Did you suddenly > > forget? > > > > Here's more debunking: > > http://wattsupwiththat.com/category/97-consensus/ > > > > > http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/24/quantifying-the-consensus-on-global-warming-in-the-literature-a-comment/ > > > > Albert Einstein, when told that 100 Nazi scientists had published a book > > rejecting his theory of special relativity as mere Jewish science, > > responded that a single paper would have sufficed to refute his > hypothesis. > > His own single paper of 1905 on the electrodynamics of moving objects* > *had > > demonstrated why Newtons laws, till then universally accepted as true, > > incompletely described the motion of celestial objects. > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bz17rNCpfuDNM1RQWkQtTFpQUmc/edit > > > > And there's this to think about: > > > > 97% of the children believe in Santa > > 97% of paranoid believe they are being followed > > 97% of the homoeopaths believe in homoeopathy > > 97% of the astrologists believe in astrology > > 97% of the KKK think lynchmobs are a good thing > > 97% of the intelligent design gang are absolutely convinced that God made > > it all > > 97% of all the interviewed Zen buddists were convinced it is possible to > > clap with one hand > > 97% of the paganist movement think sandals are fashionable > > 97% of the physicians didnt believe in washing their hands before doing > > surgery > > 97% of the politicians think they are doing some great things > > > > . > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> http://skepticalscience.com/97-percent-consensus-cook-et-al-2013.html > >> > >> A new survey <http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article> > of > >> over 12,000 peer-reviewed climate science papers by our citizen science > >> team at Skeptical Science has found a 97% consensus among papers taking > a > >> position on the cause of global warming in the peer-reviewed literature > >> that humans are responsible > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365413 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
