So what you are saying is that the authors lied, and did not review 12,000 papers. They only reviewed 64. Is that what you're saying?
On 10 July 2013 09:17, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > What are you saying? You can't read or you refuse to? > > > http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/24/quantifying-the-consensus-on-global-warming-in-the-literature-a-comment/ > > The authorsÂ’ own data file showed > that they had themselves categorized 64 abstracts, or only 0.5% of the > sample, as endorsing the consensus hypothesis as defined in their > introduction. Inspection shows only 41 of the 64 papers, or 0.3% of the > sample, actually endorsed their hypothesis. Criteria for peer review of > papers quantifying scientific consensus are discussed. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365421 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
