Also Sam endlessly repeating mere assertions does not constitute a
refutation. Its an argument mainly used by children, not knowledgeable
people.


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote:

> but sam you did not. You used a flawed argument and a straw man. Then you
> had a verbal temper tantrum.
>
> You did not demonstrate that the study was too flawed.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I ridiculed this junk science back when it came out. Did you suddenly
>> forget?
>>
>> Here's more debunking:
>> http://wattsupwiththat.com/category/97-consensus/
>>
>>
>> http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/24/quantifying-the-consensus-on-global-warming-in-the-literature-a-comment/
>>
>> Albert Einstein, when told that 100 Nazi scientists had published a book
>> rejecting his theory of special relativity as mere “Jewish science”,
>> responded that a single paper would have sufficed to refute his
>> hypothesis.
>> His own single paper of 1905 on the electrodynamics of moving objects*
>> *had
>> demonstrated why Newton’s laws, till then universally accepted as true,
>> incompletely described the motion of celestial objects.
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bz17rNCpfuDNM1RQWkQtTFpQUmc/edit
>>
>> And there's this to think about:
>>
>> 97% of the children believe in Santa
>> 97% of paranoid believe they are being followed
>> 97% of the homoeopaths believe in homoeopathy
>> 97% of the astrologists believe in astrology
>> 97% of the KKK think lynchmobs are a good thing
>> 97% of the intelligent design gang are absolutely convinced that God made
>> it all
>> 97% of all the interviewed Zen buddists were convinced it is possible to
>> clap with one hand
>> 97% of the paganist movement think sandals are fashionable
>> 97% of the physicians didnt believe in washing their hands before doing
>> surgery
>> 97% of the politicians think they are doing some great things
>>
>> .
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > http://skepticalscience.com/97-percent-consensus-cook-et-al-2013.html
>> >
>> > A new survey <http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article>
>> of
>> > over 12,000 peer-reviewed climate science papers by our citizen science
>> > team at Skeptical Science has found a 97% consensus among papers taking
>> a
>> > position on the cause of global warming in the peer-reviewed literature
>> > that humans are responsible
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365419
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to