On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > America is scared of
> > > Democrats<
> > >
> >
> http://thehill.com/house-polls/thehill-poll-week-2/124177-the-hill-poll-swing-district-voters-more-likely-to-see-dems-as-dominated-by-extremists-
> > > >and
> > > sick of their whining. 44% of likely
> > > voters <http://gawker.com/tag/likelyvoters/> say the Democratic Party
> is
> > > "more dominated by its extreme elements," versus 37% for the GOP.
> > >
> > > Addresses your comment:
> > > I also do not feel that a majority of Republicans (elected and
> > > part of constituency) do an adequate job of shutting down the (very)
> > vocal
> > > minority that are. By not standing up to the nut jobs and remaining
> > silent,
> > > it give the perception of approval.
> > >
> >
> > The link has to do with Democrats, not Republicans as I mentioned. The
> > topic if the thread was about republicans - yet you try to divert
> attention
> > elsewhere you do not help make your point.
> >
> >
> Did you not see where it said: "versus 37% for the GOP?" It was in the same
> sentence.
>

First, the gawker link is merely a 'blurb' and the link to The Hill results
in a page not found. Even the link in the blurb on Gawker results in a 404.
http://screencast.com/t/5Tj7ekETctIN That is what I see when I try to get
details of the poll.

Regardless, should my perception change simply because some people (not
even a majority of people) disagree with me?

>
>
> > Regardless of how people feel about Democrats, it does not change how I
> > feel about the republican party, as a whole, handle the 'nut jobs' - the
> > same can be said of democrats - someone from the Democratic party should
> > have publicly slammed the guy who thought Guam would top over, for
> > instance.
> >
> >
> You are taking a stance that republicans don't handle nut jobs but I'm
> showing you most people think the Dems do a worse job than the GOP. I'm
> saying you're point is based on an ill informed opinion and I have a study
> to back me up.
>

'Study'? it was a poll. Polls are not studies. That little detail aside,
can't view any of the information the poll supposedly presents due to a 404
error. Given the fact that the link you posted does not work, I'd be
willing to bet you did not even read the poll. If you did, can you please
post a working link to it?

>
>
> > When members of one party refuse to call out members of their own party
> > when they say stupid stuff, it gives the perception of approval
> >
>
> But the Republican Party did attack Todd Akin. Did the dems attack the huy
> with cash in his freezer? What about the guy that had sex with a very young
> page? He got promoted repeatedly. A republican has sex with a page and he's
> forced out of office. So what are you talking about?
>

They did not 'attack' Todd Akin, or any of the other idiots who thought
they could talk about rape, etc. last year.

'Forced out of office'? Who was that? How were they forced out of office?


>
> 'It gives the perception of approval' - 'perception' being the key word
> > there. If my son tells someone to go Fuck themselves and I do nothing
> about
> > it, it will perceive to others that I approve of his actions, even if I
> do
> > not.
> >
>
> You really let your kid talk like that and do nothing? I hope he's an adult
> at least.
> But let's get back to the point, why do you care about the perception, if
> you don't care about perception. Are you arguing just to argue?
>

You really are purposely obtuse sometimes. I can;t believe I feel the need
to say this, but, no, I do not let my children talk like that, but if by
chance they did, and I said nothing about it, people would perceive that as
their approving of his behavior.

I explained how the republican party's reactions to some of the things
their members has said and done (and the democratic party as well) is
perceived by me. I was not arguing...you were.


>
>
> > The silence only exists because you get your news from extreme left-wing
> > sources.
> >
>
> Making sweeping assumptions again. please stop, it makes you look foolish.
> >
> >
> Are you really going to try and convince me that you read balanced news
> when you have such a strong bias against anything republican?
>

What do you consider 'balanced' news? I am so sick of having to read any
news through a liberal (MSNBC, CNN, etc) filter or a conservative (FoxNews,
etc) filter. I get most of my news from the BBC, they seem to be less
sensationalized (though I bet you will say they are 'left leaning').
Typically, I will read the same story on Fox and CNN and try to figure out
where in between both stories the truth lies. It is hard sometimes. Must be
nice to just devour anything on FoxNews, or whatever 'balanced' news outlet
you get your news from, and assume it is gospel.


>
>
>
> > Starting to seem anyone who does not agree with you 100% of the time is
> > 'extreme left wing'.
> >
>
> I never asked you to agree with me, just saying you always attack anything
> that's not extreme left. It's pretty blatant.
>

You attack everything that is not extreme right, hell you attack anything
that is not even mildly leaning right. Your political scale must be all
sorts of messed up if you think I am 'extreme left'. I tend to disagree
with the extreme left and the extreme right..tells me I may be on the right
track.


>
>
> >
> > It happens. I do it all the time.
> >
> >
> I did notice after the fact backtracking but often? No.
>
>
What you call 'backtracking' I consider explaining it better so you can
understand. Sometimes, it is really hard for me to understand if the
problem is that I poorly explain my position or you are just dense.


-- 
Scott Stroz
---------------
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder
what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris

http://xkcd.com/386/


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365655
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to