On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
Regardless, should my perception change simply because some people (not > even a majority of people) disagree with me? > It show's an uniformed bias. That's all. > You are taking a stance that republicans don't handle nut jobs but I'm > showing you most people think the Dems do a worse job than the GOP. I'm > saying you're point is based on an ill informed opinion and I have a study > to back me up. > 'Study'? it was a poll. Polls are not studies. That little detail aside, > can't view any of the information the poll supposedly presents due to a 404 > error. Given the fact that the link you posted does not work, I'd be > willing to bet you did not even read the poll. If you did, can you please > post a working link to it? > There's a little box that says "Search TheHill.com" You should try it. http://thehill.com/polls/thehill-poll-week-2/124177-the-hill-poll-swing-district-voters-more-likely-to-see-dems-as-dominated-by-extremists- > But the Republican Party did attack Todd Akin. Did the dems attack the huy > with cash in his freezer? What about the guy that had sex with a very young > page? He got promoted repeatedly. A republican has sex with a page and he's > forced out of office. So what are you talking about? > They did not 'attack' Todd Akin, or any of the other idiots who thought > they could talk about rape, etc. last year. > > JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. Rep. Todd Akin defied the nation's top Republicans Tuesday to forge ahead with his besieged Senate campaign, declaring that GOP leaders were overreacting by abandoning him because of comments that women's bodies can prevent pregnancies in cases of "legitimate rape." ... Sen. Roy Blunt issued a joint statement Tuesday with all four of Missouri's living former Republican senators John Ashcroft, Kit Bond, Jim Talent and John Danforth saying "it serves the national interest" for Akin to step aside. Pointing to the group, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said the congressman should "accept their counsel." Read more: Todd Akin defies GOP leaders to stay in Missouri Senate race - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_21362714/deadline-intensifies-pressure-todd-akin-after-legitimate-rape#ixzz2ZW3McbHg And he did lose the election. > 'Forced out of office'? Who was that? How were they forced out of office? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_congressional_page_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Congressional_page_sex_scandal Studd was re-elected six more times You really are purposely obtuse sometimes. I can;t believe I feel the need > to say this, but, no, I do not let my children talk like that, but if by > chance they did, and I said nothing about it, people would perceive that as > their approving of his behavior. > Approve of or no control, either way not good. I explained how the republican party's reactions to some of the things > their members has said and done (and the democratic party as well) is > perceived by me. I was not arguing...you were. > > Now you're saying the are equal? Your entire rant was R's don't speak up. Now you changed your tune? What do you consider 'balanced' news? I am so sick of having to read any > news through a liberal (MSNBC, CNN, etc) filter or a conservative (FoxNews, > etc) filter. I get most of my news from the BBC, they seem to be less > sensationalized (though I bet you will say they are 'left leaning'). > Typically, I will read the same story on Fox and CNN and try to figure out > where in between both stories the truth lies. It is hard sometimes. Must be > nice to just devour anything on FoxNews, or whatever 'balanced' news outlet > you get your news from, and assume it is gospel. > > BBC has a liberal bias. > > Just spread it out and remember everything Larry posts here comes from a > site called rightwingwatch or something obviously biased > > You attack everything that is not extreme right, hell you attack anything > that is not even mildly leaning right. Your political scale must be all > sorts of messed up if you think I am 'extreme left'. I tend to disagree > with the extreme left and the extreme right..tells me I may be on the right > track. > What attacks? I am pointing out the fact that you are attacking the right. How did you turn that into me attacking the left? > I did notice after the fact backtracking but often? No. > > > What you call 'backtracking' I consider explaining it better so you can > understand. Sometimes, it is really hard for me to understand if the > problem is that I poorly explain my position or you are just dense. > It that you change positions so often you get dizzy You attacked the GOP for not speaking up. A few messages later you said it's not a problem for the democrats. Now suddenly it's an equal problem. You should maybe keep notes. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365664 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
