Until all our scientists are robots instead of humans, there will always be a political element to science. But if you are looking for your LEAST political arena, science is about the best you'll get.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > > Very true. Unfortunately its no longer the case. in the 70's the majority > of scientists (56 > 56%) employed in the US were Republican. In the Pew Trust Survey of a > couple of years ago, less than 6% now label themselves as Republican. Given > the hostility of the party to science in general and to several fundamental > precepts of science in general, specifically evolution, I don't think that > will change any time soon, much to the Republican Party's detriment. > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Scott Stewart <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > I agree with the sentiment that science shouldn't be politicized. It > > shouldn't be partisan at all (bi or otherwise) it needs to be above the > > stupidity that is partisan politics. > > On Aug 31, 2013 1:57 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/scientists_hate_the_gop_for_a_reason/ > > > > > > presented without a comment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366839 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
