5.56? On Jan 13, 2014 11:19 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In the 90's the Swedes though that the 5.52 NATO round was too inhumane, > with its shattering on bone impact. So they redesigned the round to be more > humane. Only thing was in tests it turned out to be much more nastier, > tumbling on impact and causing about 3 or 4 times the damage as the > standard NATO round. > > We all know what road is paved with good intensions. > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://sploid.gizmodo.com/new-bullet-expands-itself-into-four-connected-parts-to-1496153895 > > > > So the slight chance that you could survive being shot was too much. This > > bullet spawns three rapidly spinning pieces to broaden the damaged area > and > > ensure death. > > > > They could just lace each bullet with cyanide or something while they > were > > at it. Or how about putting a small nuclear bomb in each one. > > > > *siiiigh* > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:369190 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
