hey I wrote it off the top of my head. I still prefer 7.62 round but that really dates me.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:43 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > 5.56? > On Jan 13, 2014 11:19 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > In the 90's the Swedes though that the 5.52 NATO round was too inhumane, > > with its shattering on bone impact. So they redesigned the round to be > more > > humane. Only thing was in tests it turned out to be much more nastier, > > tumbling on impact and causing about 3 or 4 times the damage as the > > standard NATO round. > > > > We all know what road is paved with good intensions. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://sploid.gizmodo.com/new-bullet-expands-itself-into-four-connected-parts-to-1496153895 > > > > > > So the slight chance that you could survive being shot was too much. > This > > > bullet spawns three rapidly spinning pieces to broaden the damaged area > > and > > > ensure death. > > > > > > They could just lace each bullet with cyanide or something while they > > were > > > at it. Or how about putting a small nuclear bomb in each one. > > > > > > *siiiigh* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:369192 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
