It's not separate but equal. Two different things, two different names. Why call them homosexuals, isn't that separate but equal in your book?
I strongly support free will and the ability to have a public opinion without having ones life destroyed because you don't agree. I do not like homophobes and if someone openly states he hates gays then shoot the bastard. Eich did nothing that deserves this. Most of my gay friends are against this and care little about gay marriage, I do have two gay friends that are radicalized and while they will never marry, they will destroy the lives of as many hetro's as they can until until people become embarrassed to admit in public they are not gay. Shit's starting to get real. . On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:45 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Anyone that thinks a supporter of traditional marriage is a homophobe is > a > > useful idiot used as a tool by radicals. > > > They may or may not be homophobes. Doesn't matter. They support a "separate > but equal" system, and that makes them wrong. Period. > > WHy do you feel such a strong need to defend a position/group that you > don't even agree with, Sam? Do you just like to argue? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:369794 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
