So then what you're saying is that the good of the Republican Party is more important than the good of the Nation. That tax cuts, and the short term political advantages these cuts bring to the Republican Party are more important than the long term fiscal health of the country.
Just making sure that I have things clear. larry -- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > > Kevin Schmidt wrote: > > >As long as we cut the spending of Democrats who campaign as well as > >Republicans. > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Marlon Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:04 PM > >Subject: Re: A little to liberal for most? > > > > > > > > > >>Yes, but let's make sure we know where we're cutting it > from. If we're > >>cutting it from paying down debts, but still creating new > debts, then > >>that isn't very responsible. If we're cutting it from > supporting our > >>president to campaign on behalf of his party, that would probably be > >>responsible. If we're cutting it from SS future funds, that's not > >>responsible. > >> > >>Marlon > >> > >>Kevin Schmidt wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Yes, I agree to some people it is that simple. I agree > that we should > >>> > >>> > >get > > > > > >>>more of our money back and teach the goverment how to be fiscally > >>>responsible. Pay attention to where our tax dollars go > and cut speding > >>> > >>> > >on > > > > > >>>worthless programs. You and I might disagree on what > programs to cut, > >>> > >>> > >but I > > > > > >>>bet there would be some middle ground, so let's start there. Our > >>> > >>> > >government > > > > > >>>wastes alot of money, I don't think anyone would disagree > with that. But > >>>let's make the government learn to live off of what they have, cut > >>> > >>> > >spending > > > > > >>>and send some money back my way. After all, I earned it. > >>> > >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:47 AM > >>>Subject: Re: A little to liberal for most? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Actually - most of it is that simple. I remember going > on a business > >>>> > >>>> > >trip > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>right before the last presidential election > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>(it was to the Devcon in Washinton DC). Anyway, this cab > driver starts > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>talking politics with me. This guy was an > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>"average Joe" kind of guy - down to earth, blue collar. > He asked me who > >>>> > >>>> > >I > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>was going to vote for in the election and, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>after I told him, he disagreed and told me he was voting > for Bush. When > >>>> > >>>> > >I > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>asked him why he gave me the tax cut rhetoric > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>word for word. Stuff about the government giving him > back his money. I > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>tried to explain to him that it was a fiscally > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>irresponsible plan but he was hooked. I think his > opinion (wrong as I > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>think it was) was a big factor in the election. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Too many people see the short term gain and don't look at > what's best > >>>> > >>>> > >for > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>the country in the long run. It worked then > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>and it worked this year. > >>>> > >>>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>>From: "Kevin Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:40 PM > >>>>Subject: Re: A little to liberal for most? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>I think there is more to it than that. If you look at > the elections > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>quite a > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>few of the democrats who supported Bush on Iraq lost. > There were a > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>couple > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>who didn't and they won. I think that the Democrats don't have > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>solutions to > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>the issues and that is reflected in that poll. I mean > look at the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>numbers. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>The only thing I saw during the election from Democrats > was criticism > >>>>> > >>>>> > >of > > > > > >>>>>Republican policies and scare tactics. I didn't see any > ideas put > >>>>> > >>>>> > >forth > > > > > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>on > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>solving problems, and I think that other voters saw this > too, thus the > >>>>>history bucking Republican wins in the elections. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
