I wasn't comparing the two, I was just pointing out that gun create a lot of evidence.
Powder residue, a slug, a potential shell casing; the slug can be traced back to the gun. Yet with a blade or a blunt object, you can't get an exact match unless there is still blood left on the blade. > -----Original Message----- > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:howie@;coolfusion.com] > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:48 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Gun Company Must Pay Teacher's Widow > > My point was - a .22 sounds like a pop gun compared to what guns sound > like in movies and on TV. I just think that the > argument that guns leave a lot of evidence and are very noisy (compared to > knives) is an invalid argument. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:44 AM > Subject: Re: Gun Company Must Pay Teacher's Widow > > > > Howie, > > > > I am not sure what type of .22 handgun you are shooting, but mine makes > > about the same amount as my 9 mm. > > > > Kevin > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
