Well, the UN inspectors have not been given full access, they have not been able to hold private interviews, somebody must be present to make sure the person doesn't open their mouth or they will be killed.
They haven't found a smoking gun, but they aren't looking for a smoking gun, that means a gun has been fired. The inspectors did find where Iraq purchased items they were not supposed to. The reports I read show Iraq is not being 100% cooperative. Is that a reason for war, no, but something does need to be done, and in 10 years if we don't do something, and something does happen, then everybody is going to pissed at the US for not doing trying to stop it now. > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:09 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: [www.washtimes.com] What do u think? > > I'd like to know under what circumstances you think it would be > appropriate > NOT to go to war? > > After all, UN weapons inspectors have been allowed access to everywhere > they > wanted. They have found no evidence of WOMD. In his interim report, the > head > inspector said there was "no evidence of a smoking gun". > > Interestingly, whilst Blair seems eager to take us to the brink of war, > most > people in this country, including most probably the majority of his own > political party, are not in favour of war if the weapons inspectors find > nothing of concern. It's not surprising that the talk of oil comes up, > then. > > w > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
