can I also add 4) Saudi Arabia's increasingly anti US stance, and the fact that Bin Laden is a Saudi, and has plenty of support there, means that securing an alternative oil supply in the middle east is imperative.
will -----Original Message----- From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February 2003 15:31 To: CF-Community Subject: RE: The Choice Before Us lets think 1. the iraq's have an oil stash 2. Its worth a small fortune, enough to bolster an economy for a not insignificant while 3. All the other arguments, have no definete proof and do not really make sense, otherwise they'd be 5/6 countries we'd all be attacking together the combination leads me to my conclusion and i'm not a liberal for the record -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February 2003 14:28 To: CF-Community Subject: The Choice Before Us //snip surely i don't have to prove anything. If your government and mine wish to attack another country its THEM that have to prove they have the right to do so. So far in my opinion and many others, they havn't. //snip Why the spin? Can't you defend your assertion that the war in Iraq is all about oil? I didn't ask you to prove anything. I asked you why you thought that the oil arguments holds water. You give me the typical liberal spin. The I can't defend my position so I will bring up other points to try to deflect from the fact that I can't defend my position. Now do you see why you lose credability? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
