Continuing the metaphor, how 'bout when the police have a warrant to arrest
someone for a felony, and some of the officers say they need time to gather
more evidence?

At 02:33 PM 3/21/03 +0000, you wrote:
>The UNSC is the police in that metaphor, and in a way that's exactly
>what they are supposed to be.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: 21 March 2003 14:26
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
>
>
>Since when are we the police?
>
>Not that I'm taking Saddam's side, that's just a bad metaphor.
>
>M
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:01 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
>
>
>I can't believe what I'm reading, do you seriously mean that or are you
>winding me up?????
>
>If you're holding a gun and waving it about, and some big police man
>tells you to put it down while pointing his bigger gun at you, do you
>keep hold of your gun so you can fight back? Or do you do as you're told
>and put it down? Anyone with any sense puts his gun down right?
>
>Scuds are banned under several UNSC resolutions, he said he'd destroyed
>them and didn't have any left etc etc, clearly that's utter bs as he's
>fired around 10 into Kuwait in the last few days. If he's lied about
>Scuds, what else is he lying about? Probably an awful lot, and you see
>that as 'Hardly likely to be a big problem', wtf??? Are you on crack
>this morning Will?
>
>Don't get me wrong, war is horrific and I'm seriously concerned about
>the timing of the action, perhaps in a few months after the weapons
>inspectors realised for sure that Saddam was lying, the whole
>international community would have been behind it, but there is no doubt
>in my mind that sooner or later this was necessary.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: 21 March 2003 09:42
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
>
>
>Not really. I find it incredible that anyone seriously thought he would
>disarm. Would you, with an aggresive force sitting on your doorstep?
>That's like saying, how far do you want me to bend over.
>
>So he has a few scuds? Hardly likely to be a big problem, and lets be
>honest, if we weren't invading him we'd never know about them.....
>
>will
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 21 March 2003 09:34
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
>
>
>Hmm, that wasn't the point was it?
>
>Point is, he's using weapons only hours bfore he swore he didn't have,
>extra proof of what kind of man he is, or was (hopefully), and of why he
>needs to be dealt with.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 21 March 2003 09:32
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
>
>
>Nope....you don't kick a dog and then complain when it bites you.
>
>will
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 21 March 2003 09:09
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
>
>
>Has your opinion now changed at all since Saddam has used 'banned' scud
>missiles that he promised he didn't have?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Stephen Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 21 March 2003 02:27
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
>
>
>Candace, et al.
>
>Our Prime Minister is a horrible, xenophobic man whose driving policy
>dictate is to be as sycophantic as possible to his masters in the White
>House. Popular support for a war on Iraq without explicit, non-vetoed UN
>approval is virtually non-existent here, and through his actions, PM
>Howard has made Australia an aggressor rogue state, and therefore no
>better than the despotic regime in Iraq itself. Today, I am ashamed to
>be an Australian. I am ashamed for Australia, the US and the UK.  I can
>only hope that the full force of UN sanctions and International Criminal
>Court charges are brought heavily upon those in power here and in other
>countries who are a part of the so-called "coalition of the willing".
>
>Not this war
>Not in my name
>Not without UNSC approval
>
>Steve Collins (www.stephencollins.org)
>--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to