Sure, but John was just saying that the ONLY criminal lies should be lying under oath or perjury (isn't that redundant?). He didn't preclude fraud.
-Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:18 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Constitution, we don't need no stinking Constitution > > > Well that would fall under fraud, no? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:03 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Constitution, we don't need no stinking Constitution > > > How about the "sinking of the Maine" or the Gulf of Tonkin? Those resulted > in some rather devastating messes. > > -Kevin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:23 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Constitution, we don't need no stinking Constitution > > > > > > I think the only lying which should be a crime is the lying > under oath, or > > perjury. Other than that, if you can make a libel case stick > than I say go > > for it, otherwise if I wanna walk around saying I caught a 45 pound > > steelhead using nothing but a tootsie roll and my incredible > charm, then I > > should be able to. Do you agree? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:15 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Constitution, we don't need no stinking Constitution > > > > > > Well the fire issue is more related to the fear and chaos that such a > > pronouncement could cause. I mean If I say the sky is green and > > it's really > > blue should I be arrested? No, but lying about things is > already against > > the law in some ways. Ummmm false crime reporting, libel, > there are some > > things. > > > > Tim > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:01 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Constitution, we don't need no stinking Constitution > > > > > > Is lying protected by the Constitution? Of course, you have the right > > to express your opinion, but you can't yell "Fire" in a crowded theater, > > which of course would be lying. > > > > I'm not saying I support this ordance, just wondering about the actual > > legal ramifications. > > > > Matthew Small > > IT Supervisor > > Showstopper National Dance Competitions > > 3660 Old Kings Hwy > > Murrells Inlet, SC 29576 > > 843-357-1847 > > http://www.showstopperonline.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:55 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Constitution, we don't need no stinking Constitution > > > > http://www.startribune.com/stories/1451/3788172.html > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
