Only if it's part of your religious beliefs....

On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:31:43 -0400, Jerry Johnson 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You can't make her show her face, but if she is unwilling to get a photo 
> id, then you can't give her a driver's licence photo ID that cannot be 
> used to prove visual identity.
>
> If she can get a photo ID that completely obscures her identity, then the 
> idea of photo on the ID has just become an unnecessary part of the 
> license. OR I should be able to wear a Nixon mask when having my license 
> taken.
>
> Jerry Johnson
>
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/03 03:04PM >>>
> Well, if there is a question as to whether or not showing her face is in
> violation of her religious beliefs, why wouldn't the book that is the 
> basis
> of such beliefs be used as evidence?
>
> Remember it just Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment 
> of
> religion or permitting the free exercise thereof. If forcing her to show 
> her
> face prevents the free exercise of her religion then you can't make her 
> show
> her face.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 
>> 2:55 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: Makes you shake your head.
>>
>> What I find worrying is that a copy of the Quran has been entered into
>> evidence. I would think that it would be plainly obvious by now to
>> everyone that basing a court decision in any manner on a religious
>> belief is not allowed anywhere in the US.
>>
>> I'm not sure about the process, but I think the prosecution would be
>> within it's rights to ask that it be made inadmissible as evidence.
>> Perhaps they are angling for a guaranteed way to appeal though.
>>
>> --
>> jon
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 2:35:57 PM, you wrote:
>> RC> Why would this even be going to trial? Do you have the consitutional
>> RC> right to get a drivers license? Why doesn't she simply take a bus
>> then?
>>
>> RC> -rc
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, 
>> May 28, 2003 12:31 PM
>> >> To: CF-Community
>> >> Subject: Makes you shake your head.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I can't believe this woman was allowed to take a driver's
>> >> license photo with a veil in the first place.  Additionally,
>> >> if she wants to take the photo veiled, does that mean she'll
>> >> be driving veiled too.  Isn't that just a tad bit dangerous....
>> >>
>> >>
>> RC> http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/28/license.veil.ap/index.html
>>
>>
>> RC>
>>
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to