At what point do we say that it doesn't matter WHAT your religous beliefs are? What if your religion says its ok to have sex with underage girls - does that mean we have to allow it? Of course not.
-rc > > Only if it's part of your religious beliefs.... > > On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:31:43 -0400, Jerry Johnson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You can't make her show her face, but if she is unwilling to get a > > photo > > id, then you can't give her a driver's licence photo ID > that cannot be > > used to prove visual identity. > > > > If she can get a photo ID that completely obscures her > identity, then > > the > > idea of photo on the ID has just become an unnecessary part of the > > license. OR I should be able to wear a Nixon mask when > having my license > > taken. > > > > Jerry Johnson > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/03 03:04PM >>> > > Well, if there is a question as to whether or not showing > her face is > > in violation of her religious beliefs, why wouldn't the > book that is > > the basis of such beliefs be used as evidence? > > > > Remember it just Congress shall make no law respecting an > > establishment > > of > > religion or permitting the free exercise thereof. If > forcing her to show > > her > > face prevents the free exercise of her religion then you > can't make her > > show > > her face. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: > Wednesday, May 28, > >> 2003 > >> 2:55 PM > >> To: CF-Community > >> Subject: Re: Makes you shake your head. > >> > >> What I find worrying is that a copy of the Quran has been entered > >> into evidence. I would think that it would be plainly > obvious by now > >> to everyone that basing a court decision in any manner on > a religious > >> belief is not allowed anywhere in the US. > >> > >> I'm not sure about the process, but I think the > prosecution would be > >> within it's rights to ask that it be made inadmissible as > evidence. > >> Perhaps they are angling for a guaranteed way to appeal though. > >> > >> -- > >> jon > >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 2:35:57 PM, you wrote: > >> RC> Why would this even be going to trial? Do you have the > >> RC> consitutional right to get a drivers license? Why doesn't she > >> RC> simply take a bus > >> then? > >> > >> RC> -rc > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: > Wednesday, > >> May 28, 2003 12:31 PM > >> >> To: CF-Community > >> >> Subject: Makes you shake your head. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I can't believe this woman was allowed to take a > driver's license > >> >> photo with a veil in the first place. Additionally, if > she wants > >> >> to take the photo veiled, does that mean she'll be > driving veiled > >> >> too. Isn't that just a tad bit dangerous.... > >> >> > >> >> > >> RC> http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/28/license.veil.ap/index.html > >> > >> > >> RC> > >> > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
