> There is not law that allows any person to slit a girl's > throat. The parents only have the right to say she can't get > married until she is 18 because we place the responsibility > to raise the child with the parents. > > My very first sentence said your rights end where my right to > life, liberty, and property begin. To offer the example you > did means you did read the first line of my post.
I assume you mean did NOT read - and I concede the point - however - our laws do not stop at life, liberty, and property. What if the parents thought it was ok for their 11 year old daughter to get married and have sex? The daughter won't die - but if their religion says this is ok, should be allow it? > This person wearing a veil in a picture in no way infringes > on my rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That's not the argument though! The argument is - Does she have the right to wear her veil and still get a license if the rules for a license dictate that she not wear a veil for the picture. Her right to wear a veil doesn't "overrule" the other laws I would think. -rc ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
