Like I said; another individual's right to life, liberty, and property. Minors are not given the right to choose, only their parents or other guardian can make that choice for them. If a 15 year old girl really wants to do it, and her parents allow it, then who are we to judge?
We can think it is sick and disgusting, but they have those rights. > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:08 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Makes you shake your head. > > At what point do we say that it doesn't matter WHAT your religous > beliefs are? What if your religion says its ok to have sex with underage > girls - does that mean we have to allow it? Of course not. > > -rc > > > > > Only if it's part of your religious beliefs.... > > > > On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:31:43 -0400, Jerry Johnson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You can't make her show her face, but if she is unwilling to get a > > > photo > > > id, then you can't give her a driver's licence photo ID > > that cannot be > > > used to prove visual identity. > > > > > > If she can get a photo ID that completely obscures her > > identity, then > > > the > > > idea of photo on the ID has just become an unnecessary part of the > > > license. OR I should be able to wear a Nixon mask when > > having my license > > > taken. > > > > > > Jerry Johnson > > > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/03 03:04PM >>> > > > Well, if there is a question as to whether or not showing > > her face is > > > in violation of her religious beliefs, why wouldn't the > > book that is > > > the basis of such beliefs be used as evidence? > > > > > > Remember it just Congress shall make no law respecting an > > > establishment > > > of > > > religion or permitting the free exercise thereof. If > > forcing her to show > > > her > > > face prevents the free exercise of her religion then you > > can't make her > > > show > > > her face. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: > > Wednesday, May 28, > > >> 2003 > > >> 2:55 PM > > >> To: CF-Community > > >> Subject: Re: Makes you shake your head. > > >> > > >> What I find worrying is that a copy of the Quran has been entered > > >> into evidence. I would think that it would be plainly > > obvious by now > > >> to everyone that basing a court decision in any manner on > > a religious > > >> belief is not allowed anywhere in the US. > > >> > > >> I'm not sure about the process, but I think the > > prosecution would be > > >> within it's rights to ask that it be made inadmissible as > > evidence. > > >> Perhaps they are angling for a guaranteed way to appeal though. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> jon > > >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 2:35:57 PM, you wrote: > > >> RC> Why would this even be going to trial? Do you have the > > >> RC> consitutional right to get a drivers license? Why doesn't she > > >> RC> simply take a bus > > >> then? > > >> > > >> RC> -rc > > >> > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > > >> >> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: > > Wednesday, > > >> May 28, 2003 12:31 PM > > >> >> To: CF-Community > > >> >> Subject: Makes you shake your head. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> I can't believe this woman was allowed to take a > > driver's license > > >> >> photo with a veil in the first place. Additionally, if > > she wants > > >> >> to take the photo veiled, does that mean she'll be > > driving veiled > > >> >> too. Isn't that just a tad bit dangerous.... > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> RC> http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/28/license.veil.ap/index.html > > >> > > >> > > >> RC> > > >> > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
