I just came across this, which seems to apply. http://news.independent.co.uk/low_res/story.jsp?story=410730&host=3&dir=75
The publication seems reputable but maybe someone from Britain will let us know about that -- I am just going by the other stories on the web site. If true, well, it would not be the first time that an administration lied. The question is, does it make a difference when you go to war over the lie... And perhaps someone can explain the link to me between defeating Saddam and removing troops from Saudi Arabia. I am not sure I see how the former makes the latter possible. Thanks Dana On Sat, 31 May 2003 08:26:16 -0400, Angel Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://slate.msn.com/id/2083760/ > > "a powerful rejoinder comes from Tony Blair, the British prime minister. > "I have absolutely no doubt at all about the existence of weapons of > mass destruction," Blair told reporters on Thursday. Asked if it matters > whether they exist, Blair replied, ***"It matters immensely because the > basis on which the war was sold to the British House of Commons, to the > British people, was that Saddam represented a serious threat."*** > > It was, of course, sold on that basis to the Congress and to the > American people, too. > --------- > > I could not have put why the existence of WMD matter, better than Tony > Blair did in this speech. > > -Gel > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
