> We are talking about Britan and America AGGRESSIVELY > ATTACKING another country, Firing First,starting a war to > gain strategic influence and territory if the 'evidence' was > false. An action like that, is reason enough for a World War. > And America and Britain would be the guilty parties for > starting such a war, if they attacked Iraq based on lies.
So, how about the "evidence" that Bin Laden was in Afghanistan during the attack? Seems as though that was brushed under the carpet... And wasn't that an assault where one country attacked a WHOLE COUNTRY first when it was only a few individuals who attacked them? As a "war or terrorism" it was pretty lame - basically saying that all Terrorism comes out of that one country Where are the investigations into that little assault? The only difference was that the UK wasn't involved... And how come the US and UK against one country now constitutes a World War? > If Russia and China had attacked Taiwan, and the 'evidence' > they used was lies...what do you think would be the world response? Let's look at the amount of wars that have been started by lies, shall we? How far back in history do you want to start??? Now, let's look at when Russia first invaded Afghanistan many, many years ago... Was there any world response? Was there hell! What's the difference now? Ooooh, because the US and UK are involved, it's got to be explained BULLSHIT! > Have you sat and really thought...really conceptualised what > it MEANS for America and Britain to INVADE a soveriegn > territory by LYING to the population of America and Britain? > > Have you really thought what it means that your elected > officials LIED to you, put your citizens at risk in WAR and > then lied to you about the reasons so boldfacedly? Put your > country's sons and daughters to DIE over lies? Can you > understand how other countries in the world feel? So, how many times have you seen a politican NOT lie to you? I believe the phrase "How do you know when a politician is lieing? Their lips are moving!" covers it pretty well... > Stop. And think about it. And maybe you can understand why > the world demands answers. Or maybe not...since you are a > citizen of one of the victors in this 'war'. So, why didn't the world demand answers after the Afghan war? Was it because it was "a war against terrorism"? Hmmmmm? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
