That should have been But if 99.99% of the time you only take a small amount then over time you have probably saved money.
The last sentence is still fine. :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 4:53 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: SUVs flames again... > > If that is the case, then that is fine with me, but you don't need a > hummer. > > A 6 cylinder Jeep Grand Cherokee, or a 4 cylinder Ford Escape would do > that > job fine I imagine. > > The purchase should fit the need. If the need requires taking that many > checks on a regular basis, then by all means buy a vehicle that can handle > it. But if 99.99% of the time you take over enough to fit in the trunk, > then > over time you have probably saved more money. > > Let common sense dictate your actions on this stuff. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 4:46 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: SUVs flames again... > > > > > If the vehicles is used to take a box of checks across town, > > > then an SUV is not needed. Now if they were truly using > > > Hummers to do this, which I imagine was an exaggeration, then > > > somebody was just being dumb. > > > > We've taken HUGE amounts of boxes to our storage in the SUV > > > > If we had a Station Wagon or a compact then it would have taken 2-4 > > trips (depending on the vehicle), so we actually saved gas > > > > See, our SUV is more gas efficient than a compact <grin> > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
