woo hoo finally someone who gets it LOL

I thought i was loosing my mind and would have to move to canada


"When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!"
Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: A good american


> I think the rule here is: Don't ever talk out loud about breaking the law.
>
> If you do chain your dog up in a way where it seems the dog is being
abused,
> then the humane society should be called.
>
> If you talk about cheating on your taxes, then don't be surprised if the
tax
> man comes knocking on your door.
>
> I think the answer to the question is, don't break the rules. It doesn't
> matter what everyone else does, listen to your mother.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:05 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: A good american
> >
> > OK... actually that does contain a *glimmer* of sense. You can lose your
> > mind that way though, trying to imagine everything that someone *might*
> > dime you for. Don't yeall at your kids -- someone might call cps. Don't
> > chain your dog outside -- someone might call the humane society. Don't
> > talk
> > about your taxes -- someone might turn you in for not paying your full
> > complement of Social Security. Don't let your parking meter run out....
I
> > mean, how was he supposed to imagine that someone would accuse him of
> > spying? And on a social level not a group level it's not really fair to
> > have one guy over here accused of spying for the Chinese (presumably
> > because he is Chinese) and in solitary confinement for months on end,
> > while
> > other people walk around unhampered... is it?
> >
> > Dana
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:52:24 -0400, William Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok and if he hadn't broken rules that were not really ever enforced he
> > > wouldn't be in trouble.
> > >
> > > Its a prime example of why not to break rules even if everyone else
> > does.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was
> > good
> > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people
> > off!"
> > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:58 AM
> > > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >
> > >
> > >> Bill. Please tell me what you think peer pressure has to do with
this?
> > >> The
> > >> guy was accused of espionage and the government later says whoops we
> > are
> > >> sorry and released him.
> > >> The judge and the prosecuting attorney apologized to him. Are we even
> > >> talking about the same case??
> > >>
> > >> Dana
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:34:41 -0400, William Wheatley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > :) If he hadn't broken the rules do you think he would have been in
> > >> > trouble??
> > >> >
> > >> > Sucks to be him but i bet hes been saying if i hadn't given into
peer
> > >> > pressure to break the rules i wouldn't have been screwed. LOL
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I
was
> > > good
> > >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people
> > > off!"
> > >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:06 PM
> > >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> ::sigh:: The judge and the prosecuting attorney apologized to the
> > >> guy.
> > >> >> But
> > >> >> ok, think what you like. Have a croissant.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Dana
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:48:45 -0400, William Wheatley
> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > No in other words if you know people are going to be gunning for
> > >> you
> > >> >> > don't
> > >> >> > give them a reason to make them get you. Don't break the rules
if
> > >> he
> > >> >> > hadn't
> > >> >> > he'd be fine nobody really to blame for the situation starting
but
> > >> >> > himself.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I
> > >> was
> > >> > good
> > >> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts
> > people
> > >> > off!"
> > >> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> > >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
> > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:23 AM
> > >> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> I just saw this. I think you aren't thinking before you write.
A
> > >> > Chinese
> > >> >> >> scientist was singled out, possibly because he is Chinese.
> > > Subsequent
> > >> >> >> investigation revealed that the problem was facility wide and
the
> > >> >> >> University of California was fired as administrator. No other
> > >> >> scientist
> > >> >> >> were charged with espionage let alone spent a year in jail. I
> > have
> > > no
> > >> >> >> idea
> > >> >> >> whether he is suing or not; I just think he got a raw deal.
There
> > >> is
> > >> >> > little
> > >> >> >> point in nitpicking over this one case since neither one of us
is
> > >> >> >> looking
> > >> >> >> up the details; my point is, there is at least a distinct
> > > possibility
> > >> >> >> that
> > >> >> >> as he always maintained, he had no contact with the Chinese
> > >> >> government,
> > >> >> > and
> > >> >> >> was merely a little sloppy like every other one of the several
> > >> >> thousand
> > >> >> >> employees of the facility, not one of whom was also jailed.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> In other words, good thing we didn't shoot him.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Dana
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:14:31 -0400, William Wheatley
> > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> > Just because everyone does it is no excuse. When I get caught
> > >> > speeding
> > >> >> > do
> > >> >> >> > I
> > >> >> >> > say..everyone does it.. lol no.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > Well as I said I've seen reports on both sides of it. He knew
> > >> the
> > >> >> >> rules
> > >> >> >> > and
> > >> >> >> > he broke the, just because everyone does it doesn't mean you
> > >> >> should.
> > >> >> >> And
> > >> >> >> > he
> > >> >> >> > deserves the scrutiny he got for it. IF he wants to sue go
for
> > >> it
> > >> >> if
> > >> >> >> not
> > >> >> >> > well that's on him.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills.
Sure,
> > I
> > >> >> was
> > >> >> > good
> > >> >> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts
> > > people
> > >> >> > off!"
> > >> >> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> > >> >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
> > >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:42 PM
> > >> >> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> AFAIK he did nothing worse than take a laptop containing
> > >> >> classified
> > >> >> > data
> > >> >> >> >> out of its prescribed area. It later developed that this was
> > >> very
> > >> >> >> often
> > >> >> >> >> done at Los Alamos, and many laptops are just plain lost. UC
> > >> just
> > >> >> >> lost
> > >> >> >> >> its
> > >> >> >> >> contract to run the place due to slovenly security.
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> I don't know if he is suing. I am sure it would not endear
him
> > >> to
> > >> > the
> > >> >> > US
> > >> >> >> >> government if he did.
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> Dana
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> William Wheatley writes:
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> > Oh well better safe and in jail until its proven if there
> > was
> > >> >> > evidence
> > >> >> >> > to
> > >> >> >> >> > think you were a criminal in the first place. Is he
sueing??
> > >> If
> > >> >> >> they
> > >> >> >> > were so
> > >> >> >> >> > wrong why doesn't he have his clearance back??
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > I mean if it was me i would be pissed i was in jail but i
> > >> would
> > >> >> >> > understand
> > >> >> >> >> > they can't let me roam free with national security
interests
> > >> >> like
> > >> >> >> >> that.
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > He can sue to get his stuff back if it was that unjust. I
> > >> read
> > >> >> on
> > >> >> > both
> > >> >> >> > sides
> > >> >> >> >> > of the story.
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > He was still lookign rather unsavory maybe he realizes he
> > got
> > >> >> off
> > >> >> > easy
> > >> >> >> > and
> > >> >> >> >> > not to push his luck
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills.
> > >> Sure,
> > > I
> > >> >> >> was
> > >> >> >> > good
> > >> >> >> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it
puts
> > >> > people
> > >> >> >> > off!"
> > >> >> >> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> > >> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dana Tierney"
> > >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> >> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:00 PM
> > >> >> >> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > > suuuure the system worked; the guy spent a year in jail,
> > >> and
> > > I
> > >> >> > think
> > >> >> >> > he
> > >> >> >> >> > > lost his security clearance. Hard to get work as a
nuclear
> > >> >> > physicist
> > >> >> >> >> > > without one. All for something which subsequent
> > >> investigation
> > >> >> >> >> revealed
> > >> >> >> > to
> > >> >> >> >> > > be SOP at Los Alamos.
> > >> >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > Dana
> > >> >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > William Wheatley writes:
> > >> >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > Sure thats why you dont summarly shoot them and let
them
> > >> >> goto
> > >> >> >> >> trial
> > >> >> >> >> > first.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > Now if its wartime and you are a spy well you're dead
> > >> meat
> > >> >> no
> > >> >> >> >> trial
> > >> >> >> >> > needed
> > >> >> >> >> > > > sometimes by law but he was found innocent. System
> > >> worked..
> > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no
skills.
> > >> >> Sure,
> > >> >> >> I
> > >> >> >> >> was
> > >> >> >> >> > good
> > >> >> >> >> > > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume -
it
> > > puts
> > >> >> >> >> people
> > >> >> >> >> > off!"
> > >> >> >> >> > > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> > >> >> >> >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Dana
Tierney"
> > >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> >> >> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
> > >> >> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > I am not really in favor of anyone being shot. A spy
> > in
> > >> >> >> wartime
> > >> >> >> >> > *might* be
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > an exception. However, the scientist I mentioned was
> > >> >> accused
> > >> >> >> of
> > >> >> >> > spying
> > >> >> >> >> > for
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > China, and later on they dropped all charges except
> > >> one,
> > >> >> >> >> something
> > >> >> >> >> > like
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > failing to follow proper procedures with classified
> > >> data.
> > >> > And
> > >> >> >> >> this
> > >> >> >> > was
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > probably because the man had already been on jail
> > >> almost
> > > a
> > >> >> > year;
> > >> >> >> >> > proper
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > procedures were so rarely followed at Los Alamos
that
> > >> the
> > >> >> >> >> contract
> > >> >> >> > for
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > running the place was recently revoked. Point is,
> > >> >> sometimes
> > >> >> > they
> > >> >> >> > are
> > >> >> >> >> > wrong
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > about "spies" too.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > Dana
> > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > Wayne Putterill writes:
> > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > :)
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > I'm a pacifist, I won't ask for anyone to be shot.
> > >> I'll
> > >> >> >> even
> > >> >> >> > give
> > >> >> >> >> > them
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > the rights they deny other prisoners.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Sent: 11 June 2003 16:17
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > To: CF-Community
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > I don't want to talk to the men in black this
> > week.
> > >> >> >> >> Therefore
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > I have to disagree with you. If we were talking
> > >> about
> > >> >> >> other
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > penalties.... I might not.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Wayne Putterill writes:
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > True, in my opinion Bush and Blair may have
both
> > >> >> >> betrayed
> > >> >> >> > their
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > respective countries by deceiving the
> > population.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > From: Dana Tierney
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Sent: 11 June 2003 16:03
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > To: CF-Community
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: A good american
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > I suspect that "those who would betray this
> > >> >> country"
> > >> >> > has
> > >> >> >> >> a
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > lot of room in it for argument. I am pretty
> > >> sure
> > >> > that
> > >> >> > if
> > >> >> >> >> I
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > agreed with you on the statement, you and I
> > >> would
> > >> > not
> > >> >> > be
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > agreeing on who should be shot. So that
throws
> > >> up
> > >> >> a
> > >> >> > huge
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > caution flag in my opinion.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Dana
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > John Stanley writes:
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Not at all. Those who would betray this
> > >> country
> > >> >> > should
> > >> >> >> > be
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > shot. Those
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > who serve valiantly this country deserve
our
> > >> >> >> respect
> > >> >> >> >> and
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > admiration.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > From: Larry C. Lyons
> > >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:55 AM
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > To: CF-Community
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: A good american
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Let me put it this way, the sort of belief
> > >> that
> > >> >> >> >> deifies
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > veterans etc
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > is as
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > dangerous as those who would gladly betray
> > >> this
> > >> >> >> >> country.
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > At 09:35 AM 6/11/2003 -0400, John Stanley
> > > wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >While I hardly think
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >that my survival depends on the
> > sacrifices
> > > of
> > >> >> >> the
> > >> >> >> >> > military,
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >Let me clarify, do you mean that you do
not
> > >> >> >> respect
> > >> >> >> >> the
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > veterans who
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >have served and sometimes died for the
> > >> Untied
> > >> >> > States?
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.cfhosting.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to