has to be history before it can be revised... Kevin Graeme writes:
> There's a little difference of 10 years there. And the fact that the > inspectors back in the early '90s DID destroy material and stated that > the materials Iraq was manufacturing had a shelf-life of only a few > years. The long range capability the administration touted has been > disproven, and the supposed light aircraft for dispensing something has > been shown to be only a prototype of something less useful than the > original Wright Flyer. > > We had first hand evidence of the existence of Saddam right before the > war. We don't yet for WMD. I supported inspectors before the war, and I > strongly support an investigation now in the apparent absence of WMD. > > It's just a joke that Bush is the one calling it "revisionist history". > > -Kevin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:24 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History > > > > > > I saw enough evidence that he at one point had them (Kurds), > > and he provided no evidence that he had destroyed them, > > therefore we had to assume that they still exist, as you > > assume that Saddam really does exist, even though you have no > > direct proof of it. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:20 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History > > > > > > Heh. There's a flaw in your argument in that we had already > > seen Saddam and his sons, there were interviews with him > > right before the war, and we fought his military during the > > war. There is no question that he did indeed exist. > > > > Unlike with Saddam, we didn't see the WMD. We saw the > > administration pulling an old McCarthy tactic of waving > > around sheets of paper and saying they had evidence. We know > > now that McCarthy's list of names of Communists was a stack > > of empty papers. We still need to see what the Bush > > administration had. > > > > -Kevin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:01 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History > > > > > > > > > How come no one has brought up the fact that Iraq must not > > > have had Saddam or his son's there either, because they > > > haven't been found as well. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:59 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History > > > > > > > > > "As Congress prepares to launch hearings into questionable > > > intelligence provided on Iraq's weapons capability, President > > > Bush dismisses as "revisionist history" accusations that his > > > administration embellished reports to bolster the case for > > > war." NPR, June 17, 2003 > > > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:51 AM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History > > > > > > > > > > > > i need more information > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:47 AM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Revisionist History > > > > > > > > > > > > Ha, ha. It is to laugh. > > > > > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
