At 09:14 AM 6/18/2003 -0500, Doug White wrote: >The answer may be found in French Passports, and truckloads of US $100 bills.
What French Passports? That turned out to be a fabrication. larry >If the US revised the design of the $100 bill, and refused to exchange old for >new for anyone off shore - what would happen to the world economy? > >====================================== >Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! >For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com >ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 >====================================== >If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:44 AM >Subject: RE: Revisionist History > > >| There's a little difference of 10 years there. And the fact that the >| inspectors back in the early '90s DID destroy material and stated that >| the materials Iraq was manufacturing had a shelf-life of only a few >| years. The long range capability the administration touted has been >| disproven, and the supposed light aircraft for dispensing something has >| been shown to be only a prototype of something less useful than the >| original Wright Flyer. >| >| We had first hand evidence of the existence of Saddam right before the >| war. We don't yet for WMD. I supported inspectors before the war, and I >| strongly support an investigation now in the apparent absence of WMD. >| >| It's just a joke that Bush is the one calling it "revisionist history". >| >| -Kevin >| >| > -----Original Message----- >| > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >| > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:24 AM >| > To: CF-Community >| > Subject: RE: Revisionist History >| > >| > >| > I saw enough evidence that he at one point had them (Kurds), >| > and he provided no evidence that he had destroyed them, >| > therefore we had to assume that they still exist, as you >| > assume that Saddam really does exist, even though you have no >| > direct proof of it. >| > >| > -----Original Message----- >| > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >| > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:20 AM >| > To: CF-Community >| > Subject: RE: Revisionist History >| > >| > >| > Heh. There's a flaw in your argument in that we had already >| > seen Saddam and his sons, there were interviews with him >| > right before the war, and we fought his military during the >| > war. There is no question that he did indeed exist. >| > >| > Unlike with Saddam, we didn't see the WMD. We saw the >| > administration pulling an old McCarthy tactic of waving >| > around sheets of paper and saying they had evidence. We know >| > now that McCarthy's list of names of Communists was a stack >| > of empty papers. We still need to see what the Bush >| > administration had. >| > >| > -Kevin >| > >| > > -----Original Message----- >| > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >| > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:01 AM >| > > To: CF-Community >| > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History >| > > >| > > >| > > How come no one has brought up the fact that Iraq must not >| > > have had Saddam or his son's there either, because they >| > > haven't been found as well. >| > > >| > > -----Original Message----- >| > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >| > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:59 AM >| > > To: CF-Community >| > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History >| > > >| > > >| > > "As Congress prepares to launch hearings into questionable >| > > intelligence provided on Iraq's weapons capability, President >| > > Bush dismisses as "revisionist history" accusations that his >| > > administration embellished reports to bolster the case for >| > > war." NPR, June 17, 2003 >| > > >| > > -Kevin >| > > >| > > > -----Original Message----- >| > > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >| > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:51 AM >| > > > To: CF-Community >| > > > Subject: RE: Revisionist History >| > > > >| > > > >| > > > i need more information >| > > > >| > > > -----Original Message----- >| > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >| > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:47 AM >| > > > To: CF-Community >| > > > Subject: Revisionist History >| > > > >| > > > >| > > > Ha, ha. It is to laugh. >| > > > >| > > > -Kevin >| > > > >| > > > >| > > > >| > > >| > > >| > >| > >| > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
