inline Nick McClure writes:
> But I am not and will not be bringing up Clinton and any adultery issues. I > think what he did was wrong, and it was conduct unbecoming the president. > That being said, I don't think the question should have been asked unless it > was clear that what he was doing was interfering with his duties as > President. Good. I will even go a step further. It *was* conduct unbecoming a president and the question *should* have been asked. It just has nothing to do with the Constitution or with George Bush. > While personally I think it could have, I don't think there was evidence > that could lead to the conclusion. Anybody saying it did is purely > speculating. I don't know. I think it does raise significant moral issues. > I think saying that Bush has trashed the Constitution remains to be seen. We > still have to remember that it takes congress to pass laws. And many of > these laws per passed in bi-partisan votes. See Udall's description of how the Patriot Act was passed. Remember, this was a couple of weeks after 9/11 and to question the president was tantamount to treason. > The final outcome remains to be seen. I am cautiously optimistic. I just hope it isnt already too late. I am glad lawmakers are waking up about Patriot II. Dana > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:44 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: well now > > > > I think Doug is talking about the exchanges that go: > > > > A - Bush has trashed the Constitution > > > > B - Clinton committed adultery > > > > A - Bush has perverted the governmental process to make his friends rich > > > > B - Clinton lied about committing adultery. > > > > ... Anyway. I am pointing the finger at the Bush administration because I > > think it is doing great wrong. I would criticize Gore if he had railroaded > > a Patriot Act through the Congress as well. > > > > I am still interested in seeing some references to contracts under > > previous > > administrations. If you are correct about that it would make the whole > > thing look a lot less suspicious and belive it or not I don't enjoy > > Orwellian scenarios -- they just seem appropriate at the moment. > > > > Dana > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
