what were the oh, 15 or 25 emails before you started bringing up those, and exempting the drunk in public one, i have to dispute the rest. never mind how amazing it is that it comes back to you showing us examples of the law, which wasn't the point. the point was should the -government have the right- to do these things, not what is currently in effect.
--d. -----Original Message----- From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:14 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: woo hoo The "female" told you what the definition of a public place is and backed it up with seven different references. If you *must* be irrationally insulting at least be accurate. Dana > i can respect anyone who can validly make a point. i understand that isn't > what you mean when you say that, but hence why when ian was talking about > his view, at least i could understand the logical reasoning, unlike the > female who just told us how she felt. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
