oh. I thought that just became the point after I showed you what a public place was, this mind you in response to your demand that I show you what possible legal or other reason I could have for saying it was a public place. Or was that your evil twin? I forget. I do know Tim called me a Communist for saying it was.
Anyway. I leave you with one final reference: http://www.esgs.org/uk/log37.htm And I will take the advice given there, which is to walk away. Have a nice day. Dana Nagy, Daniel J writes: > what were the oh, 15 or 25 emails before you started bringing up those, and > exempting the drunk in public one, i have to dispute the rest. never mind > how amazing it is that it comes back to you showing us examples of the law, > which wasn't the point. the point was should the -government have the right- > to do these things, not what is currently in effect. > > --d. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:14 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > The "female" told you what the definition of a public place is and backed > it up with seven different references. If you *must* be irrationally > insulting at least be accurate. > > Dana > > > i can respect anyone who can validly make a point. i understand that isn't > > what you mean when you say that, but hence why when ian was talking about > > his view, at least i could understand the logical reasoning, unlike the > > female who just told us how she felt. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
