I know that Canada has a different ethos.  I never said they didn't.  I said
that Canada was a socialist country.  Dana argued the point.  You then
posted definitions that basically proved my point.

I don't need to look into the rise of socialism inside the US.  I know how
extreme some of our politicians actually are.  I know about the National
Recovery Act.  I know how people want the government to baby sit them.
Rather like a PPO?  Only government controlled.

> To place under government or group ownership or control.

Your definition man.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:33 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Altruism (was RE: US threatens Caribbean Countries)


>In Canada it is much more pronounced.  The programs for natives and
>minorities, the fact that you get paid an allowance for each child you
have,
>the way that private property is handled there, centralized socialized
>health care, no right to self defense.  I think the US is headed towards
>socialism I just think Canada is beating us to the punch.


Lets see, Canada has a different ethos than the US, Peace Order and 
Good Government,vs Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

As for the medicare stuff, you may want to dig around a bit and look 
at the debates that happened in the 1950's and 1960's regarding the 
Canadian Medical System. You will find it most instructive

BTW its not a centralized socialized system, doctors can opt out., 
Moreover the structure is more like a very large PPO rather than a 
socialized system. You seem to equate the Canadian system with the 
British or French systems. You need to research it a bit more. Given 
your points, is the German medical system a socialized system?

BTW as for socialized, I certainly hope that the medical system is 
socialized, I'd hate to have to be treated by anti-social doctors and 
nurses:

from dictionary.com

so�cial�ize     P     Pronunciation Key   (s sh -l z)
v. so�cial�ized, so�cial�iz�ing, so�cial�iz�es
v. tr.
To place under government or group ownership or control.
To make fit for companionship with others; make sociable.
To convert or adapt to the needs of society.

v. intr.
To take part in social activities.

So in essence I'd prefer my doctors to be sociable.

larry


>
>Tim
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:30 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Altruism (was RE: US threatens Caribbean Countries)
>
>
>Um? I don't see your point. There is such a thing as state aid there, as
>there is here.
>
>Dana
>
>Heald, Tim writes:
>
>>  >who advocated state aid for the betterment of the working classes
>>
>>  This is what I am talking about.
>>
>>  Tim
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:10 PM
>>  To: CF-Community
>>  Subject: Re: Altruism (was RE: US threatens Caribbean Countries)
>>
>>
>>  Me thinks that he's using socialist as a pejorative, and not really
using
>>  the word as its actually defined:
>>
>>  from dictionary.com
>>
>>  Socialism
>>
>>
>>
><http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=socialism%20of%20the%20chair>Soci
a
>>  lism
>>  of the chair [G. katheder socialismus], a term applied about 1872, at
>first
>>  in ridicule, to a group of German political economists who advocated
state
>
>>  aid for the betterment of the working classes. Sock \Sock\, v. t. [Perh.
>>  shortened fr. sockdolager.] To hurl, drive, or strike violently; --
often
>>  with it as an object. [Prov. or Vulgar] --Kipling.
>>
>>  \So"cial*ism\, n. [Cf. F. socialisme.] A theory or system of social
reform
>
>>  which contemplates a complete reconstruction of society, with a more
just
>>  and equitable distribution of property and labor. In popular usage, the
>>  term is often employed to indicate any lawless, revolutionary social
>>  scheme. See
<http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=communism>Communism,
>
>>  <http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fourierism>Fourierism,
>>
><http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=saint-simonianism>Saint-Simoniani
s
>>  m,
>>  forms of socialism.
>>
>>  [Socialism] was first applied in England to Owen's theory of social
>>  reconstruction, and in France to those also of St. Simon and Fourier . .
.
>
>>  The word, however, is used with a great variety of meaning, . . . even
by
>>  economists and learned critics. The general tendency is to regard as
>>  socialistic any interference undertaken by society on behalf of the
poor,
>.
>>  . . radical social reform which disturbs the present system of private
>>  property . . . The tendency of the present socialism is more and more to
>>  ally itself with the most advanced democracy. --Encyc. Brit.
>  >
>  > We certainly want a true history of socialism, meaning by that a
history
>of
>  > every systematic attempt to provide a new social existence for the mass
of
>
>  > the workers. --F. Harrison.
>>
>>
>>  At 05:52 PM 7/8/2003 +0000, Dana Tierney wrote:
>>  >Well Tim, considering you also think that I am in favor of socialized
>>  >medecine, I can't say I have a lot of respect for that opinion. I mean,
>>  >c'mon, you equate favoring non-smoking restaurants with being
>>  >anti-business. You are simply wrong, like when you claimed Canada was a
>>  >socialist country, hehe.
>>  >
>>  >Dana
>>  >
>>  >Heald, Tim writes:
>>  >
>>  > > I am not saying that based on your last comments.  I am saying that
>>  > based on
>>  > > our discussions over time I have come to the conclusion that you are
>>  indeed
>>  > > a collectivist.  I am also saying that I don't think you realize it
on
>>  any
>>  > > conscious level.  You tend to have opinions on individual political
>>  > matters,
>>  > > not one larger overriding image of what the government should look
>like.
>>  > > When you take all of your opinions together this is the impression I
>>  have
>>  > > gotten.
>>  > >
>>  > > Also I am not saying that you don't deserve to hold these opinions,
or
>>  have
>>  > > a job or should be black listed, so I think the McCarthy label is a
>bit
>>  > off.
>>  > >
>>  > > Tim
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > -----Original Message-----
>>  > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  > > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:33 PM
>>  > > To: CF-Community
>>  > > Subject: Re: Altruism (was RE: US threatens Caribbean Countries)
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > what??? How do you get "collectivist thought" out of a summary of a
>dead
>>  > > philosopher's writing?? I didn't even say I agreed with him (or her)
>and
>>  am
>>  > > at a loss to see how you get collectivism out of it in the first
>place.
>>  > >
>>  > > McCarthyism Alert on Tim.
>>  > >
>>  > > Dana
>>  > >
>>  > > Heald, Tim writes:
>>  > >
>>  > > > This is one of those times when I think you don't see what the sum
>>  result
>>  > > of
>>  > > > your own beliefs is.  I believe there is more of collectivist
>thought
>>  in
>>  > > you
>>  > > > than you realize.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Tim
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > > -----Original Message-----
>>  > > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  > > > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:39 PM
>>  > > > To: CF-Community
>>  > > > Subject: Re: Altruism (was RE: US threatens Caribbean Countries)
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > > > > Mill's and Bentham's writing on utilitarianism claim that
>>  > > > > > when you work for yourself and your own happiness, your truly
>>  > > > > > working for "society" or the community.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Actually, I think it was the other way around. I have not read
>>  > Bentham but
>>  > > > Mills said that altruistic acts in fact provide the doer with
>utility,
>>  > > such
>>  > > > as good feelings about himself. Assuming that it was Mills that
>wrote
>>  > > > Utilitarianism; a lot of people seem to think it was his wife.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > > > liberal at times (I may be getting confused, I think Dana and
>>  > > > > > Larry are the only ones that I really have pegged at this
>>  > > > > > point.).
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Not based on that summary of my alleged beliefs the other day you
>dont
>>  :)
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Cheers,
>>  > > > Dana
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  >
>>
>>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.cfhosting.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to