I am not used to Tim agreeing with me. But I do think that yes, it matters
that he is a minor, however it just makes it worse; he would also have a
case if he were over 18. The harm however would not be as egregious.

Dana

Heald, Tim writes:

> When you join the military you sign away most of your rights, however there
> is medical care provided for those that go through traumatic events.
> 
> I witnessed a murder at 8 (along with a hundred other people).  Should I
> have had the right to sue, no, it wasn't targeted at me, although you could
> make the argument.
> 
> If you saw someone having sex in an alley, well 1 your an adult, and should
> be able to deal with that, and 2 they were breaking the law and so you might
> have some sort of case.
> 
> Now in this case, the images of a minor were released, and even eventually
> his name, without his parents permission.  Open and shut as far as I am
> concerned.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:56 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fat Brat sues 
> 
> 
> Ok let me try to take a Dana type logical approach and dissect your argument
> ;).
> 
> And I agree they were trying to embarrass him.
> 
> So saying because he was traumatized by that he can sue. Can the soliders
> who sign up for military service and see someone get blown to bits can they
> sue for emotional distress? What about when my daughter saw someone get
> murdered if she was emotionally disturbed should she be able to sue the
> murderer??
> 
> If i saw someone having sex in an alley and it disturbed me?
> 
> I mean of course they can sue but i hope people are not rewarded for being
> dumbasses.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:37 PM
> Subject: RE: Fat Brat sues
> 
> 
> > Bill, I got to disagree with you on this one. I think the actions of
> > those kids was intended to publicly humiliate this kid and that they had
> > no right to put that up without his permission. If the kid is
> > traumatized as a result, he should have the right to sue. This should be
> > regardless of the fact they made money off the action, the question is
> > whether or not they hurt this person in some meaningful way. My take on
> > it is, yes, they did.
> >
> > M
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:30 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Fat Brat sues
> >
> >
> > Sure file a criminal complaint.
> >
> > And if they MADE money off it sue, or sue to get it removed but this
> > emotional distress crap has gotten way out of hand. People can't deal
> > with life so they have to get money to get comfort. The problem is even
> > spreading to canada now :) Oh boy that can be the american legacy a
> > bunch of whiney people who gotta sue for everything.
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to