I say run guys run. Besides, every day they spend in an expensive hotel
here is  a boost for the local economy :)

Andy Ousterhout writes:

> Ahh,  the brilliance of our forefathers....Helps prevent the majority from
> railroading the minority I guess.  In which case, it is as legal as the
> majority controlling the redistricting....
> 
> Pass out the popcorn, lets watch TX and CA reality TV.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:09 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Emergency: Democracy under attack in Texas
> 
> 
> Yes, but the quorum loophole is a perfectly legal part of the process too.
> Considering that, it's actually laudable how infrequently it gets used.
> 
> -Kevin
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Ousterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 6:58 AM
> Subject: RE: Emergency: Democracy under attack in Texas
> 
> 
> > Sandy,
> >
> > This deserves our mirth, not attention or money.  This is one of the
> oldest
> > tricks in the book.  Democrats in Illinois did it a few years back and
> > gained several seats in both houses, as I remember.  Republicans did not
> run
> > and hide, because what they did was perfectly legal, as supported by the
> > State Supreme Court.  And you should see the shape of some of the
> districts!
> > So this is NOT democracy under attack.  It is democracy at work and the
> > democrats in Texas, not liking when it goes against them, are fighting in,
> > IMHO, an inappropriate  fashion. What would be the state of our democracy
> if
> > EVERY group of politicians decided NOT to show up when they disagreed?
> >
> > This is exactly the same thing crap that went on in Florida and still has
> > the dems crying(and you can really hear their tears of righteousness when
> > they pulled the same illegal BS in New Jersey).  When it works for the
> > democrats it is great.  When they get creamed by the same tactic, it is
> > un-American and a right wing plot to take over the world.  I am so tired
> of
> > their two-faced BS.
> >
> > In summary, it is just a butch of cry babies throwing a temper tantrum
> when
> > their God-given right (but wait, they don't believe in God in Government?)
> > to govern is challenged.
> >
> > Oh, I feel sooo much better now.  Time to go out for a run.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sandy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 6:01 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: FW: Emergency: Democracy under attack in Texas
> >
> >
> > I don't normally pass this stuff on, but I think this one deserves some
> > attention.  However I have to warn you that their donation page is not
> > secure. I am currently getting information on how to donate via PayPal and
> > will be glad to pass that on to those who want the information off list.
> >
> > Sandy
> >
> >  From: Zack  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Exley, MoveOn.org
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:04 PM
> > Subject: Emergency: Democracy under attack in Texas
> >
> > Dear MoveOn member,
> >
> > Impeachment. The 2000 Election. The California Recall. The pattern is
> > becoming clear: there's a group of men in power who will do anything to
> > consolidate that power, including undermining our democratic institutions.
> > We've got to fight back. In Texas, they are fighting back. And while the
> > world is focusing on the California mess, they are fighting alone. They
> need
> > our help.
> >
> > A partisan plan pushed by Karl Rove and Tom Delay will redistrict up to 7
> > Democrats out of Congress. Right now, 11 Democratic State Senators are
> > hiding across state lines -- with the Texas Governor calling for their
> > arrest -- to prevent this illegitimate plan from being strong-armed into
> > law. They have put their reputations and careers on the line for all of
> us.
> > A letter below from State Senator Rodney Ellis explains the situation in
> > detail. Please read it, and then please help us launch a hard-hitting ad
> > campaign to fight back in Texas. Whether you donate $5 or $5000, you will
> be
> > helping to hold accountable reckless leaders who think they can get away
> > with anything. Please contribute to this effort now:
> >
> > http://moveon.org/texasads
> > <http://moveon.org/texasads?id=1595-2240002-M3WjX6jzxSCzgvKUUyXKeA>
> >
> > The Texas special session that was called to gerrymander the Texas
> > congressional districts ends early next week, and the pressure is
> building.
> > These courageous leaders need to see real support now, or they won't be
> able
> > to hold out.
> >
> > Our numbers our great enough now to fight back effectively against these
> > attacks on democracy. Please get even more people involved by forwarding
> > this email to everyone you think would like to help.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --Zack and Wes
> >   MoveOn.org PAC
> >   August 20th, 2003
> >
> > Below is the letter from State Senator Rodney Ellis.
> > ___________________
> > August 18, 2003
> >
> > Dear friends,
> >
> > I am writing to you from a hotel room in Albuquerque, New Mexico, where I
> > and 10 of my colleagues in the Texas Senate have been forced to reside for
> > the past 20 days. If we return to our homes, families, friends, and
> > constituents, the Governor of Texas will have us arrested.
> >
> > I know, it sounds more like a banana republic than the dignified democracy
> > on which we have long prided ourselves. We are effectively exiled from the
> > state due to our unalterable opposition to a Republican effort -- pushed
> by
> > Tom Delay and Karl Rove, and led by Texas Governor Rick Perry -- that
> would
> > rewrite the map of Texas Congressional districts in order to elect at
> least
> > 5 more Republicans to Congress.
> >
> > You may not have heard much about the current breakdown in Texas politics.
> > The Republican power play in California has obscured the Republican power
> > play in Texas that has forced my colleagues and me to leave the state.
> >
> > Recognizing that public pressure is the only thing that can break the
> > current stalemate, our friends at MoveOn have offered to support our
> efforts
> > by sharing this email with you. In it, you will find:
> >
> > * Background information on how the situation in Texas developed;
> >
> > * Analysis of what's at stake for Democrats and the democratic
> > process; and
> >
> > * How you can help by contacting Texas politicians, signing our
> > petition, contributing funds, and forwarding this email!
> >
> > The Republican redistricting effort shatters the tradition of performing
> > redistricting only once a decade immediately after the Census -- making
> > redistricting a perpetual partisan process. It elevates partisan politics
> > above minority voting rights, in contravention of the federal Voting
> Rights
> > Act. It intends to decimate the Democratic party in Texas, and lock in a
> > Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives. And Republican
> > efforts to force a vote on this issue by changing the rules of legislative
> > procedure threaten to undermine the rule of law in Texas.
> >
> > We do not take lightly our decision to leave the state. It was the only
> > means left to us under the rules of procedure in Texas to block this
> > injustice. We are fighting for our principles and beliefs, and we can win
> > this fight with your support.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Rodney Ellis
> > Texas State Senator (Houston)
> >
> > Background
> >
> > During the 2001 session of the Texas Legislature, the legislature was
> unable
> > to pass a Congressional redistricting plan as it is required to do
> following
> > the decennial Census. A three judge federal panel was forced to draw the
> > plan. Neither Governor Rick Perry or then Attorney General John Cornyn,
> both
> > Republicans, objected to the plan, which was reviewed and approved by the
> > U.S. Supreme Court.
> >
> > The 2002 Congressional elections, the first held under the new
> redistricting
> > plan, resulted in a Congressional delegation from Texas consisting of 17
> > Democrats and 15 Republicans. However, five of the 17 Democrats prevailed
> > only because they were able to win the support of Republican and
> independent
> > voters. All statewide Republican candidates carried these five districts.
> > Most experts agree that the current plan has 20 strong or leaning
> Republican
> > districts and 12 Democratic districts.
> >
> > Meanwhile, the 2001 redistricting of Texas legislative seats (which was
> > enacted by the Republican-controlled Legislative Redistricting Board,
> after
> > the legislature again gridlocked in its efforts) resulted in wide
> Republican
> > majorities in both the Texas House and Texas Senate. Now Tom Delay has
> made
> > it his priority to force the Republican-controlled Legislature to enact a
> > new redistricting plan to increase the number of Republican-leaning
> > Congressional districts. Republicans believe they can manipulate the
> > districts to elect as many as 22 Republicans out of the 32 member Texas
> > Congressional delegation. They achieve this by packing minority voters
> into
> > as few districts as possible and breaking apart rural districts so that
> the
> > impact of independent voters will be reduced and suburban Republican
> voters
> > will dominate.
> >
> > During the regular session of the Texas Legislature, Democratic members of
> > the Texas House of Representatives exercised an unprecedented
> parliamentary
> > move to prevent the House from passing Tom Delay's redistricting plan.
> While
> > Democrats are in the minority of the House of Representatives, the state
> > constitution requires that at least 2/3 of the House be present for the
> > House to pass a bill. Because it was clear that the Republicans would
> > entertain no debate and brook no compromise in their effort to rewrite the
> > rules by which members of Congress are elected, the Democrats were forced
> to
> > break the quorum to prevent the bill from passing. Because the Republican
> > Speaker of the House and Governor called on state law enforcement
> officials
> > to physically compel the Democrats to return, the lawmakers removed
> > themselves to a Holiday Inn in Ardmore, Oklahoma -- outside the reach of
> > state troops(1). In there effort to apprehend the Democrats, Tom Delay
> > officially sought the hel! p of the Department of Homeland Security, the
> > Department of Transportation and the Department of Justice.
> >
> > The House Democrats (nicknamed the "Killer D's", based on an earlier
> episode
> > in Texas history in which a group of Democratic state senators called the
> > "Killer Bees" broke the quorum in the Senate over a similarly political
> > stalemate) succeeded in stopping Delay's redistricting plan during the
> > regular session, returning to Texas after the legislative deadline had
> > expired for the House to pass legislation. However, because the Texas
> > Legislature meets in regular session only every two years, the state
> > constitution gives the Governor the power to call a 30-day special
> > legislative session at any time between regular sessions. Despite
> statewide
> > protests from Texas citizens who oppose Tom Delay's redistricting plan,
> the
> > Governor has called two special sessions(2) already this summer to attempt
> > to force the legislature to enact a new plan.
> >
> > The first called session expired in a deadlock, as 12 of 31 Texas
> > Senators(3) opposed the plan. Under Senate rules and tradition, a 2/3 vote
> > is required to consider any bill on the floor of the Senate, giving 11
> > Senators the power to block a vote(4). The Republican Governor and
> > Lieutenant Governor then determined they would do away with the 2/3 rule,
> > and called another special session, forcing 11 Democratic Senators to
> break
> > the quorum and leave the state.(5) These Senators have spent the past 22
> > days in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
> >
> > The Governor has indicated he will continue calling special sessions until
> > the Republican redistricting plan is enacted, despite the fact that the
> > Republican-controlled Texas Supreme Court recently rejected the Governor's
> > writ of mandamus filing to compel the Senators to return to the Senate.
> > Meanwhile, eleven Democratic state senators are exiled from their state,
> > unable to be with their families, friends, and constituents, for fear of
> > being arrested as part of a partisan power play by Republicans. In the
> most
> > recent indignity, Republican Senators voted to fine the absent Democrats
> up
> > to $5,000 per day, and to revoke parking and other privileges for their
> > staffs as long as the Senators are away.
> >
> > What's at stake
> >
> > At stake, on the surface, is whether Tom Delay will succeed in exploiting
> > Republican control of the Texas Legislature to add to the Republican
> > majority in the United States Congress. But deeper issues are also at
> stake.
> >
> >
> > * If the Republicans succeed in redrawing the Texas Congressional
> > lines to guarantee the election of five to seven more Republicans, it will
> > ensure that Republicans hold the majority in the U.S. House of
> > Representatives for the entire decade and will likely result in Tom Delay
> > becoming Speaker of the House.(6)
> >
> > * The Republican advantage would be gained by removing many African
> > American and Hispanic voters from their current Congressional districts
> and
> > "packing" them into a few districts that already have Democratic
> majorities.
> > The voting power of these minority voters would be dramatically diluted by
> > the Republican plan, in contravention of the federal Voting Rights Act. If
> > the Republicans succeed, over 1.4 million African American and Hispanic
> > voters will be harmed. It would be the largest disenfranchisement of
> > minority voters since the Voting Rights Act was passed.
> >
> > * Redistricting exists for the purpose of reapportioning voters among
> > political districts to account for population shifts. The purpose of this
> > reapportionment is to ensure a roughly equal number of voters in each
> > district, to preserve the principle of "one man, one vote."(7) For this
> > reason, redistricting has always been conducted immediately following the
> > U.S. Census' decennial population reports. Tom Delay now proposes a new
> > redistricting plan two years after the Census report simply because
> > Republicans gained control over the Texas Legislature in 2002 and now have
> > the power to enact a much more Republican-friendly plan than the one drawn
> > by the federal courts two years ago. This is an unprecedented approach to
> > redistricting, one that subordinates its original purpose of ensuring the
> > principle of "one man, one vote" to the purpose of perpetual partisan
> > politics. Redistricting, in this model, would never be a settled matter,
> and
> > districts would constantly be in fl! ux depending on the balance of
> > political power in the Legislature.
> >
> > * The Texas Legislature has traditionally been defined by a spirit of
> > bipartisanship and cooperation. This issue has polarized the legislature
> in
> > a way that threatens to destroy that tradition. The Republicans have
> > effectively exiled their Democratic counterparts in a power play that
> makes
> > our state look more like a banana republic than a dignified democracy. The
> > arbitrary decision to discard the 2/3 rule in the Senate sets a precedent
> > that undermines that body's tradition of consensus and cooperation. The
> > deployment of state law enforcement officials to apprehend boycotting
> > legislators erodes the separation of powers between the executive and
> > legislative branches of government, and diminishes legislators' ability to
> > represent their constituents as they see fit. The unilateral Republican
> > effort to penalize Democratic Senators and their staffs
> >
> > What is needed
> >
> > The Democratic Senators currently in Albuquerque have two critical needs.
> > The first is to generate increased public awareness of the situation. By
> all
> > reason, every day the Senators are out of the state this story should get
> > bigger. Instead, news media have gradually lost interest in the story. The
> > California recall has dominated the attention of the national media, and
> the
> > Texas media has largely lost interest in the story -- out of sight, out of
> > mind. Without public attention to this story, the Republicans have all the
> > leverage -- if it does not cost them politically, it costs them nothing(8)
> > to continue calling special sessions until the Texas 11 are forced to come
> > home.
> >
> > The second critical need is funding. The cost of hotels, meeting rooms,
> > staff support, and public relations efforts is mounting. In addition, the
> > Senators must defend themselves legally against Republican efforts to
> compel
> > their return, while also filing legal claims against the Republican power
> > play. The Senators are actively raising money for the Texas Senate
> > Democratic Caucus Fund to offset these costs and prepare themselves for a
> > stay of indefinite duration in Albuquerque.
> >
> > Notes
> >
> > 1. A recent Department of Justice investigation chronicled Republican
> state
> > officials' illegal attempts to use federal resources -- including
> > anti-terrorism resources from the Department of Homeland Security -- to
> > compel the Democratic lawmakers' return. See
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51520-2003Aug12.html for a
> > news report on the Justice Department investigation, or
> > http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/03-08a/final.pdf for a copy of the
> complete
> > Justice Department report.
> > 2. At a cost to taxpayers of over $1.5 million per session.
> > 3. House Republicans passed a redistricting bill in the special session
> > despite an outpouring of public opposition in hearings across the state.
> All
> > 12 Democratic state senators opposed the plan, along with Republican state
> > senator (and former Lieutenant Governor) Bill Ratliff.
> > 4. The "2/3 rule" requires the Senate to reach broader consensus on
> > difficult issues than a simple majority vote. It is a combination of
> > official Senate rules and tradition. The rules of the Senate require a 2/3
> > vote to suspend the "regular order of business" to consider a bill that is
> > not the first bill on the Senate calendar. By tradition, the Senate has
> > always placed a "blocker bill" at the top of the Senate calendar, so that
> > every bill requires a suspension of the regular order of business to be
> > considered. The process requires compromise and consensus to achieve a 2/3
> > majority on each bill. One Texas insider has said that the 2/3 rule is
> "what
> > separates us from animals."
> > 5. In fact, the Governor and Lt. Governor attempted to "surprise" the
> > Senators by calling the second special one day early and "trap" them in
> the
> > Senate Chamber. The Senators were able to escape the Capitol with
> literally
> > minutes to spare.
> > 6. Republican party activist Grover Norquist, head of the Washington
> > D.C.-based Americans for Tax Reform, was quoted as follows in the August
> 17
> > Fort Worth Star Telegram: "Republicans will hold the House for the next
> > decade through 2012 if Texas redistricts.It depresses the hell out of the
> > Democrats and makes it doubly impossible to take the House and probably
> > depresses their fund raising.Anything that helps strengthen the Republican
> > leadership helps DeLay become speaker someday if he wants it."
> > 7. Established in the landmark case Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
> > 8. Notwithstanding the millions of dollars it is costing taxpayers.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

Reply via email to