We have two cats in the office and recently had them declawed because they were scratching up all the cubes. They seems to be getting a long ok but they lick their paws a lot more. And BOY! Are they loving milking the attention. lol
-----Original Message----- From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:56 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: PUBLIC AUTO INSURANCE A BETTER DEAL: STUDY MPIC has been profitable since the early 80's any provincial subsidy stopped years ago. At 03:48 PM 9/11/2003, you wrote: >Of course it's cheaper. It's subsidized, and doesn't have to worry >about making a profit. > >Timothy Heald >Information Systems Manager >Overseas Security Advisory Council >U.S. Department of State >571.345.2319 > >The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the >U.S. Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have >these opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This >e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:39 PM >To: CF-Community >Subject: RE: PUBLIC AUTO INSURANCE A BETTER DEAL: STUDY > > >In comparison to Edmonton, which is a bit larger than Winnipeg. >Edmonton was about $1000 more per year. Moreover Winnipeg is larger >than several of the other provincial capitals where auto insurance is >private, yet it has significantly lower auto insurance costs. The >comparisons also extended to smaller cities. The CAC compared smaller >cities in both groups, and found similar results, public auto insurance >rates were significantly lower than in those cities were auto insurance >was private. Lethbridge Alberta vs Cranbrook BC was one of the >comparisons for instance. Remember the study used insurance quotes for >the exact same drivers in these 40 cities. In each and every case >private insurance was more expensive than the publicly owned >comparisons. > >regards, >larry > >At 01:54 PM 9/11/2003, you wrote: > >"It found Winnipeg motorists pay the lowest prices of all the capital >cities > >in Canada for car insurance." > > > >That's what their basing the statement on? Yeah and if I live in > >Portland, Maine, I will pay a lot less than I do in D.C. > > > >Amazing. > > > >Timothy Heald > >Information Systems Manager > >Overseas Security Advisory Council > >U.S. Department of State > >571.345.2319 > > > >The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the > >U.S. Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have > >these opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. > >This e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:50 PM > >To: CF-Community > >Subject: PUBLIC AUTO INSURANCE A BETTER DEAL: STUDY > > > > > >PUBLIC AUTO INSURANCE A BETTER DEAL: STUDY > >A new study says public auto insurance schemes, such > >as the one in Manitoba, provides better > >coverage at lower prices compared to private > >insurance schemes. > > > >FULL STORY > >http://winnipeg.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=mb_insurance200 > >30911 > > > >Strike another one for government owned companies. > > > >larry > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
