If a system was implemented to allow people to vote on the relevance of a thread
in a list (mainly in the tech lists), would it be better to vote on the entire
thread or on just a message in the thread? I'm thinking something like:
must read 2 points
important 1 point
neutral 0 points
off topic -1
fight/debate -2
The problem is that there are some members of CF-Talk who can turn a technical
thread with an average score of 1 or 2 into one with a negative score rather
easily. Do we penalize the entire thread because of these people or do we want
people in some way.
The idea is for people coming to the front of the archive to have a color coded
clue as to what threads are really important and which ones can be avoided.
Most everything in CF-Community would be -1 or -2. :)
More 'avoid pain' work.
--
Michael Dinowitz
Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know you had yet

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to