As for discipline among posters, there are some very specific people who just
don't have the discipline to not debate, flame, continue OT posts, etc.
> Actually, in my opinion, the best solution is already in effect and should not
> require additional coding.
> This should not be a democracy, it should be up to the list owner to police
> relevancy as is currently being done. There is a posting policy in existence,
> and it should be up to the list owner, who provides this FREE service to be
able
> to run it any way he/she chooses.
>
> Implementing a scoring methodology, would permit an active few (depending on
the
> mood of the day) to bury topics that could be of interest to the more laid
back
> readers, and further allowing the active few to dominate the list. This form
of
> indirect flaming would not be a good thing, IMHO.
>
> A little discipline among the posters would go a long way.
>
> Doug
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
