Karma is based more on what you feel is right or wrong, rather than any
hard and fast rules.
For example, you mentioned hurting the jobs of others by providing cheap
labor. My question is, isn't that what the US has been promoting for
years? Haven't we been pushing the capitalist model on the world since
we decided communism == bad? So what right have we to get upset about
them taking jobs that people in the US want more money to take?
More to the point, if you were hungry and unemployed, would you worry
about taking someone else's job by doing it cheaper? Or would you worry
about feeding your kids?
--benD
Bill Wheatley wrote:
> So what hurts and helps karma? I mean if they are so worried about karma
> why wouldn't care about hurting the jobs of others by undercutting it
> with cheaper labor? I'm just thinking abstractly I suppose. Because you
> can get to a point where you could say its bad karma to breath because
> you are depriving the earth of air. Or by walking you're hurting earth
> by killing things that are so tiny you can't even see them with the
> naked eye. Who is to say where the line is drawn in regards to what is
> positive karma and what is negative karma? Is there reading material
> with a +/- chart on Karma?
>
>
> Abstractly Yours
>
>
> --
> Bill Wheatley
> Senior Database Developer
> eDiets.com, Inc.
> (OTCBB: EDET)
> 3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> F: (954) 360-9095
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:58 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Email
>
> That's patently unfair to Indians. I mean, people so careful of their
> karma are *not* going to work for Awful On Line.
>
> --benD
>
> Dana Tierney wrote:
>
> > your garden variety AOL tech has no idea how to whitelist anyone and
> is in
> > India anyway....
> >
> > Doug White writes:
> >
> > > AOL has instituted blocking from certain types of domains as part
> of
> > their
> > > anti-spam initiative.
> > > To get the fastest results, your AOL customers need to contact
> AOL
> > support
> > > (the more the better) and ask them to whitelist your mail server.
> > >
> > > Also your mail server MUST have a reverse DNS set up
> > >
> > > ======================================
> > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
> > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
> > > Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1 and all
> databases.
> > > Suggested corporate Anti-virus policy:
> > http://www.dshield.org/antivirus.pdf
> > > ======================================
> > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:01 PM
> > > Subject: Email
> > >
> > >
> > > | I set up a site that is capable of sending automatic mailings to
> > > | registered users, and we are getting a lot of bouncebacks from
> AOL. The
> > > | specific reason provided is that the server has been repeatedly
> used to
> > > | transfer unsolicited bulk email. Not a good thing, and I need to
> solve
> > > | the problem.
> > > |
> > > | Any ideas? The email is not coming from our domain, but we are on
> a
> > > | shared server and need to get the mail out.
> > > |
> > > | M
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > >
> >
> _____
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
