--
Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
eDiets.com, Inc.
(OTCBB: EDET)
3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Karma was RE: Email
For a Buddhist the effect of an action on karma depends on whether the
action was "skilful" or "unskilful", or if you prefer the intent of the
actions - if the intent was to harm then it produces bad karma.
Basically the "law of karma (or kharma)" is that we are the product of
our past actions, it's not that there is something or somebody out there
keeping score but we change and develop according to the actions we
perform (karma translated literally is "action").
I think Hinduism has basically the same concept, I know Jainism is
different in that they believe that all actions, intentional or not,
creates karma.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2003 14:36
To: CF-Community
Subject: Karma was RE: Email
So what hurts and helps karma? I mean if they are so worried about karma
why wouldn't care about hurting the jobs of others by undercutting it
with cheaper labor? I'm just thinking abstractly I suppose. Because you
can get to a point where you could say its bad karma to breath because
you are depriving the earth of air. Or by walking you're hurting earth
by killing things that are so tiny you can't even see them with the
naked eye. Who is to say where the line is drawn in regards to what is
positive karma and what is negative karma? Is there reading material
with a +/- chart on Karma?
Abstractly Yours
--
Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
eDiets.com, Inc.
(OTCBB: EDET)
3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Email
That's patently unfair to Indians. I mean, people so careful of their
karma are *not* going to work for Awful On Line.
--benD
Dana Tierney wrote:
> your garden variety AOL tech has no idea how to whitelist anyone and
is in
> India anyway....
>
> Doug White writes:
>
> > AOL has instituted blocking from certain types of domains as part
of
> their
> > anti-spam initiative.
> > To get the fastest results, your AOL customers need to contact
AOL
> support
> > (the more the better) and ask them to whitelist your mail server.
> >
> > Also your mail server MUST have a reverse DNS set up
> >
> > ======================================
> > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
> > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
> > Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1 and all
databases.
> > Suggested corporate Anti-virus policy:
> http://www.dshield.org/antivirus.pdf
> > ======================================
> > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:01 PM
> > Subject: Email
> >
> >
> > | I set up a site that is capable of sending automatic mailings to
> > | registered users, and we are getting a lot of bouncebacks from
AOL. The
> > | specific reason provided is that the server has been repeatedly
used to
> > | transfer unsolicited bulk email. Not a good thing, and I need to
solve
> > | the problem.
> > |
> > | Any ideas? The email is not coming from our domain, but we are on
a
> > | shared server and need to get the mail out.
> > |
> > | M
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > |
> >
>
_____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
