:)

Nope - it still clouds the mind, just in a different way.

Many Buddhists follow the spirit of that precept rather than the letter,
even some of the ordained people I know enjoy an occasional drink, and I
don't think many of them could survive without tea or coffee.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2003 16:33
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Karma was RE: Email

So, if we're supposed to get bad karma from intoxicants that cloud the
mind, do we get good karma from caffeiene?

heeheehee....

--benD

Wayne Putterill wrote:

> The standards in Buddhism are the five precepts:
>
> 1. Not killing or causing harm to other living beings
> 2. Not taking the not-given
> 3. Avoiding sexual misconduct
> 4. Avoiding false speech
> 5. Abstaining from intoxicants that cloud the mind
>
> Each of the precepts also has a positive side which produce good
karma:
>
> 1. Love
> 2. Generosity
> 3. Contentment
> 4. Truthfulness
> 5. Mindfulness
>
> I can't comment on other eastern religions take on the issue, but I
> believe they have basically the same principles.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 November 2003 15:10
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Karma was RE: Email
>
> Well i was just being sarcastic and using the taking of jobs as an
> example off the cuff.
>
> So if karma is based off what you feel is right and wrong (Cliche
> warning) does that mean Saddam or Hitler have excellent karma because
> i'm sure they thought they were doing right. I would think karma has
to
> be based off some standard and i would also think its not social
> standards or norms because so many times social standards and norms
are
> repressive and not a true reflection of an actions good or bad rating.
>
> Maybe karma comes down to the golden rule? Don't do things you
wouldn't
> want others to do unto you? AHh such deep thoughts time to have some
> cinnamon tea now
>
> --
> Bill Wheatley
> Senior Database Developer
> eDiets.com, Inc.
> (OTCBB: EDET)
> 3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> Deerfield Beach, FL  33442
> V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> F: (954) 360-9095
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W:  <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Karma was RE: Email
>
> What follows is mostly speculation:
>
> Karma is based more on what you feel is right or wrong, rather than
any
> hard and fast rules.
>
> For example, you mentioned hurting the jobs of others by providing
cheap
>
> labor.  My question is, isn't that what the US has been promoting for
> years?  Haven't we been pushing the capitalist model on the world
since
> we decided communism == bad?  So what right have we to get upset about
> them taking jobs that people in the US want more money to take?
>
> More to the point, if you were hungry and unemployed, would you worry
> about taking someone else's job by doing it cheaper?  Or would you
worry
>
> about feeding your kids?
>
> --benD
>
> Bill Wheatley wrote:
>
>  > So what hurts and helps karma? I mean if they are so worried about
> karma
>  > why wouldn't care about hurting the jobs of others by undercutting
it
>  > with cheaper labor? I'm just thinking abstractly I suppose. Because
> you
>  > can get to a point where you could say its bad karma to breath
because
>  > you are depriving the earth of air. Or by walking you're hurting
earth
>  > by killing things that are so tiny you can't even see them with the
>  > naked eye. Who is to say where the line is drawn in regards to what
is
>  > positive karma and what is negative karma? Is there reading
material
>  > with a +/- chart on Karma?
>  >
>  >
>  > Abstractly Yours
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Bill Wheatley
>  > Senior Database Developer
>  > eDiets.com, Inc.
>  > (OTCBB: EDET)
>  > 3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
>  > Deerfield Beach, FL  33442
>  > V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
>  > F: (954) 360-9095
>  > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > W:  <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>  >
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:58 AM
>  > To: CF-Community
>  > Subject: Re: Email
>  >
>  > That's patently unfair to Indians.  I mean, people so careful of
their
>  > karma are *not* going to work for Awful On Line.
>  >
>  > --benD
>  >
>  > Dana Tierney wrote:
>  >
>  >  > your garden variety AOL tech has no idea how to whitelist anyone
> and
>  > is in
>  >  > India anyway....
>  >  >
>  >  > Doug White writes:
>  >  >
>  >  >  > AOL has instituted blocking from certain types of domains as
> part
>  > of
>  >  > their
>  >  >  > anti-spam initiative.
>  >  >  > To get the fastest results, your AOL customers need to
contact
>  > AOL
>  >  > support
>  >  >  > (the more the better) and ask them to whitelist your mail
> server.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Also your mail server MUST have a reverse DNS set up
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > ======================================
>  >  >  > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
>  >  >  > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
>  >  >  > Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1 and all
>  > databases.
>  >  >  > Suggested corporate Anti-virus policy:
>  >  > http://www.dshield.org/antivirus.pdf
>  >  >  > ======================================
>  >  >  > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > ----- Original Message -----
>  >  >  > From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  >  > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  >  > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:01 PM
>  >  >  > Subject: Email
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > | I set up a site that is capable of sending automatic
mailings
> to
>  >  >  > | registered users, and we are getting a lot of bouncebacks
from
>  > AOL. The
>  >  >  > | specific reason provided is that the server has been
> repeatedly
>  > used to
>  >  >  > | transfer unsolicited bulk email. Not a good thing, and I
need
> to
>  > solve
>  >  >  > | the problem.
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > | Any ideas? The email is not coming from our domain, but we
are
> on
>  > a
>  >  >  > | shared server and need to get the mail out.
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > | M
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  > |
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >   _____  
>  >
>  >
>   _____  
>
>


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to