- Matt Small
----- Original Message -----
From: Heald, Tim
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:02 AM
Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News
Realistically adultery is a religious construct. You look at the various
polyamory movements and swingers and so forth and see groups that don't
believe in monogamy, and they are perfectly happy with their choice. Now
obviously you need to look at it kind of like contract law too I guess. If
you agree to monogamy during your vows you should be somehow bound, but
altering the vows to allow extra marital relations should certainly be
allowed. The military has some very out dated laws regarding sexuality
still. Sodomy of any kind, even when consent is given, is prohibited.
That's just silly in this day and age.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News
I was just thinking the same thing...
Obviously, adultery has no consistent meaning in a legal sense and all
definitions of it should be thrown out until something that works can be
discovered. This should apply to religious institutions as well.
Should mean Erika is released from any monogomous obligations she
previously felt bound by, Gel.
M
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News
So let me get this right...
In Massachusetts, same-sex marriages are ok
But in New Hampshire, if you are married and have an affair with someone
of
the same sex, it is not adultery.
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
