because they were immoral heathens: Nero, Caligula, etc. ;-)
<cf_cough>Both Romans</cf_cough>
<cf_cough>Not Greek</cf_cough>
will
Matthew Small wrote:
> "Something to consider. The ancient Greeks thought of women as mere
> receptacles for procreation, and the highest form of love, that of a
> 12 to 15 year old boy.
>
> While I find that personally repugnant, does that make the ideas they
> advanced invalid?
>
> Similarly does that make their contributions to our civilization any less?
>
> larry"
>
> - Actually, ask yourself where their society is today. It declined
> because they were immoral heathens: Nero, Caligula, etc. ;-)
>
> - Matt Small
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Re:CNN Breaking News
>
> >
> >Do I worry that since it is said that sexual orientation is
> >hereditary, that the more gays breed the more gays will be born?
> >Hmm. I'll have to back burner that one. I don't think so.
> >
> >Do I think that "catering" to gays will wreck our society? No. There
> >have been gays in every society I have read about. The smarter
> >societies made use of these differences.
> >
> >Certainly have some deep thinking to do.
> >
> >Yikes.
> >Jerry Johnson
>
> Something to consider. The ancient Greeks thought of women as mere
> receptacles for procreation, and the highest form of love, that of a
> 12 to 15 year old boy.
>
> While I find that personally repugnant, does that make the ideas they
> advanced invalid?
>
> Similarly does that make their contributions to our civilization any
> less?
>
> larry
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
