there are two major choices, buying package link-farm deals from
monolithic porn companies, or trying to work off original content
alone. The upside of the former is that you get loads of content, but
you're indistinguishable from other sites, and apparently, the upkeep of
sites like that is extraordinarily time-consuming. The latter option -
original content - can be financially prohibitive if you can't invest in
at least one decent camera and some decent lighting. I suppose if you
found a exploitable niche where you could scan polaroids and sell
$30/month subscriptions, then you're good to go, but the added costs of
bandwidth and trying to make sure your images aren't ripped off can be
just as time-consuming.
- Jim
Kevin Graeme wrote:
>I read an article recently that trying to get rich by creating an adult web
>site is probably not a good business decision.
>
>The basic premise is that you can't compete with the entrenched players, so
>don't bother trying. Of course, my counter argument is the suicide girls.
>
>-Kevin
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Marlon Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:07 PM
>Subject: Re: would you work for...
>
>
>
>
>>I remember seeing a site years ago called wifeysworld.com. Back when I
>>saw it, this husband and wife duo were posting pictures of themselves.
>>In the background, you could see the old shag carpeting, dark drapes,
>>and fake wood paneling of their house. I just recently went to it (for
>>research purposes only) and now it looks like they live in some million
>>dollar mansion in Arizona. Makes me wonder if I chose the wrong career
>>path :)
>>
>>Marlon
>>
>>Paul Ihrig wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>its a 36 hour work week....
>>>it is better then mcDweedles
>>>28k a year...
>>>
>>>kind of crappy...
>>>maybe now my wife will let me build pr0n sites....
>>>
>>>we could get a house if i did...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
