they re-airing it?"
- Jim
Bill Wheatley wrote:
>when are they reairing it?
>
>
>--
>Bill Wheatley
>Senior Database Developer
>eDiets.com, Inc.
>(OTCBB: EDET)
>3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
>Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
>V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
>F: (954) 360-9095
>E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:17 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>
>
>I hear in the next episode, they're going to come out with some special
>sunglasses that will enable them to differentiate humans and cylons.
>They're supposedly going to have some guest star also. Roddy
>something....
>
>marlon
>
>Ben Doom wrote:
>
>
>
>>I kinda liked the slow pacing. It felt more ... epic. Rather than
>>battle on battle on tragedy on battle.
>>
>>Yeah. The butterfly had me ready to pull wings off a ... well, you
>>know. Frickin' butterfly.
>>
>>And I didn't even come close to seeing the twist at the end coming.
>>Now, I'm going to have to watch it again to see if there are clues I
>>missed, or if it's one of those annoying unforshadowed twists that bug
>>
>>
>me.
>
>
>>As far as a series goes....
>>I could use some new TV in my life. :-)
>>
>>--benD
>>
>>Kevin Graeme wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Oh I liked it. It just needed a lot of editing. It does beg for a
>>>
>>>
>>series.
>>
>>
>>>Hatch must be praying to every god known right now.
>>>
>>>-Kevin (I still want to punch the butterfly.)
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Tim Heald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:18 PM
>>>Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>>>
>>> > I liked it. Good twist at the end.
>>> >
>>> > Damn I hope they bring it back as a series.
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:14 PM
>>> > To: CF-Community
>>> > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Dammit. I give them the benefit of the doubt and then they give
>>>
>>>
>me
>
>
>>>that?!?
>>> >
>>> > Can you say "vehicle for AOL vs. MSN ads?" I wanted to punch
>>>
>>>
>>that damn
>>
>>
>>> > butterfly.
>>> >
>>> > Okay. Really. I still stand by what I said before about what I
>>>
>>>
>>liked.
>>
>>
>>>But
>>> > the whole damn thing could have been an hour long, 1:30 at
>>>
>>>
>>most, and it
>>
>>
>>> > still would have had all the good stuff.
>>> >
>>> > I hate miniseries writers.
>>> >
>>> > -Kevin
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:21 AM
>>> > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>>> >
>>> > > I'm with you man. Good so far. Can't wait for part two. I
>>>wonder if
>>> > maybe
>>> > > this isn't just a test case to see how it works as a series?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Timothy Heald
>>> > > Web Portfolio Manager
>>> > > Overseas Security Advisory Council
>>> > > U.S. Department of State
>>> > > 571.345.2319
>>> > >
>>> > > The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those
>>>
>>>
>>of the
>>
>>
>>>U.S.
>>> > > Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor
>>>
>>>
>have
>
>
>>>these
>>> > > opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations.
>>>
>>>
>This
>
>
>>> > is
>>> > > unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>>> > >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:23 AM
>>> > > To: CF-Community
>>> > > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I was pleasantly suprised as well by the first part, and am
>>>
>>>
>>looking
>>
>>
>>> > forward
>>> > > to the second half. it makes me wonder how they can complete
>>>
>>>
>the
>
>
>>>story
>>> > in
>>> > > just two hours, when they went as slow as they did in the
>>>
>>>
>>first half.
>>
>>
>>> > >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:19 AM
>>> > > To: CF-Community
>>> > > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>>> > >
>>> > > Details? Ha! I sent the message and then went to bed.
>>> > >
>>> > > It was shown twice again last night and will be shown again
>>>
>>>
>>tonight
>>
>>
>>> > before
>>> > > the second part. And it's on again this Sunday. So I'm not
>>>
>>>
>>going to
>>
>>
>>>say
>>> > > anything about the plot itself. It's a two-parter and while I
>>>
>>>
>was
>
>
>>> > pleased
>>> > > with it, that's because I thought it was going to be crash
>>>
>>>
>>and burn
>>
>>
>>> > > sucktackular.
>>> > >
>>> > > Spoilers?
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > .
>>> > > IMO, they more than adequately addressed the stylistic
>>>
>>>
>>differences
>>
>>
>>> > between
>>> > > the original and this series. In fact, I think it was a damn
>>>
>>>
>fine
>
>
>>> > cop-out.
>>> > > The first shot of Galactica came in at that rear three
>>>
>>>
>>quarters angle
>>
>>
>>> > with
>>> > > odd optical lens distortion that was part of the original
>>>
>>>
>>show, and
>>
>>
>>> > later
>>> > in
>>> > > the show there's even a bit of the original theme music. The
>>>
>>>
>show
>
>
>>>picks
>>> > up
>>> > > 20 years after the first Cylon wars. Technology has
>>>
>>>
>>progressed. The
>>
>>
>>> > > Galactica is an aging vessel and about to be decomissioned.
>>>
>>>
>>It's used
>>
>>
>>> > > primarily as a tourist exhibit and there's a gift shop and
>>>
>>>
>museum
>
>
>>> > display
>>> > in
>>> > > one of the hangers. In the museum they have an old Cylon in a
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>glass
>>
>>
>>>case
>>> > and
>>> > > old Vipers on display. The old equipment though is going to
>>>
>>>
>>be the
>>
>>
>>> > saving
>>> > > grace against the Cylons and their new ability to affect
>>>
>>>
>>networked
>>
>>
>>> > computer
>>> > > systems.
>>> > >
>>> > > The evil Cylon woman is sexxay. Olmos as Adama is haggard and
>>>gravelly.
>>> > He's
>>> > > looking old, but his character is supposed to. Starbuck is
>>>
>>>
>>fine as a
>>
>>
>>> > woman
>>> > > (I got over that kind of problem 15 years ago when I saw a
>>>
>>>
>stage
>
>
>>> > production
>>> > > of Romeo and Juliet with Mercutio played by an asian woman),
>>>
>>>
>>but her
>>
>>
>>> > > tremulous first line left me wondering if she was going to be
>>>
>>>
>a
>
>
>>>strong
>>> > > enough character. She makes up for it later.
>>> > >
>>> > > My only complaint? It's fucking SLOW. Why is it that when you
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>have a
>>
>>
>>>TV
>>> > > miniseries it automatically means that it's going to be
>>>
>>>
>>waaaaaay too
>>
>>
>>> > much
>>> > > exposition? The whole 2 hours was basically initial character
>>> > development.
>>> > > Sure some stuff happened, but it was just to set up the
>>>
>>>
>second
>
>
>>>episode.
>>> > I
>>> > > hope.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Kevin
>>> > >
>>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:50 PM
>>> > > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>>> > >
>>> > > > Details.... some of us are still working.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > M
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > > > Sent: Mon 12/8/2003 11:15 PM
>>> > > > To: CF-Community
>>> > > > Cc:
>>> > > > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Yay! It doesn't suck! Yay I say!
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Kevin
>>> > > > _____
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > _____
>>> > > _____
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
> _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
