-Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
> when are they reairing it?
>
>
> --
> Bill Wheatley
> Senior Database Developer
> eDiets.com, Inc.
> (OTCBB: EDET)
> 3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> F: (954) 360-9095
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:17 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>
>
> I hear in the next episode, they're going to come out with some special
> sunglasses that will enable them to differentiate humans and cylons.
> They're supposedly going to have some guest star also. Roddy
> something....
>
> marlon
>
> Ben Doom wrote:
>
> > I kinda liked the slow pacing. It felt more ... epic. Rather than
> > battle on battle on tragedy on battle.
> >
> > Yeah. The butterfly had me ready to pull wings off a ... well, you
> > know. Frickin' butterfly.
> >
> > And I didn't even come close to seeing the twist at the end coming.
> > Now, I'm going to have to watch it again to see if there are clues I
> > missed, or if it's one of those annoying unforshadowed twists that bug
> me.
> >
> > As far as a series goes....
> > I could use some new TV in my life. :-)
> >
> > --benD
> >
> > Kevin Graeme wrote:
> >
> > > Oh I liked it. It just needed a lot of editing. It does beg for a
> > series.
> > > Hatch must be praying to every god known right now.
> > >
> > > -Kevin (I still want to punch the butterfly.)
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tim Heald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:18 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
> > >
> > > > I liked it. Good twist at the end.
> > > >
> > > > Damn I hope they bring it back as a series.
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:14 PM
> > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dammit. I give them the benefit of the doubt and then they give
> me
> > > that?!?
> > > >
> > > > Can you say "vehicle for AOL vs. MSN ads?" I wanted to punch
> > that damn
> > > > butterfly.
> > > >
> > > > Okay. Really. I still stand by what I said before about what I
> > liked.
> > > But
> > > > the whole damn thing could have been an hour long, 1:30 at
> > most, and it
> > > > still would have had all the good stuff.
> > > >
> > > > I hate miniseries writers.
> > > >
> > > > -Kevin
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:21 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
> > > >
> > > > > I'm with you man. Good so far. Can't wait for part two. I
> > > wonder if
> > > > maybe
> > > > > this isn't just a test case to see how it works as a series?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Timothy Heald
> > > > > Web Portfolio Manager
> > > > > Overseas Security Advisory Council
> > > > > U.S. Department of State
> > > > > 571.345.2319
> > > > >
> > > > > The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those
> > of the
> > > U.S.
> > > > > Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor
> have
> > > these
> > > > > opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations.
> This
> > > > is
> > > > > unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:23 AM
> > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I was pleasantly suprised as well by the first part, and am
> > looking
> > > > forward
> > > > > to the second half. it makes me wonder how they can complete
> the
> > > story
> > > > in
> > > > > just two hours, when they went as slow as they did in the
> > first half.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:19 AM
> > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
> > > > >
> > > > > Details? Ha! I sent the message and then went to bed.
> > > > >
> > > > > It was shown twice again last night and will be shown again
> > tonight
> > > > before
> > > > > the second part. And it's on again this Sunday. So I'm not
> > going to
> > > say
> > > > > anything about the plot itself. It's a two-parter and while I
> was
> > > > pleased
> > > > > with it, that's because I thought it was going to be crash
> > and burn
> > > > > sucktackular.
> > > > >
> > > > > Spoilers?
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > IMO, they more than adequately addressed the stylistic
> > differences
> > > > between
> > > > > the original and this series. In fact, I think it was a damn
> fine
> > > > cop-out.
> > > > > The first shot of Galactica came in at that rear three
> > quarters angle
> > > > with
> > > > > odd optical lens distortion that was part of the original
> > show, and
> > > > later
> > > > in
> > > > > the show there's even a bit of the original theme music. The
> show
> > > picks
> > > > up
> > > > > 20 years after the first Cylon wars. Technology has
> > progressed. The
> > > > > Galactica is an aging vessel and about to be decomissioned.
> > It's used
> > > > > primarily as a tourist exhibit and there's a gift shop and
> museum
> > > > display
> > > > in
> > > > > one of the hangers. In the museum they have an old Cylon in a
>
> > glass
> > > case
> > > > and
> > > > > old Vipers on display. The old equipment though is going to
> > be the
> > > > saving
> > > > > grace against the Cylons and their new ability to affect
> > networked
> > > > computer
> > > > > systems.
> > > > >
> > > > > The evil Cylon woman is sexxay. Olmos as Adama is haggard and
> > > gravelly.
> > > > He's
> > > > > looking old, but his character is supposed to. Starbuck is
> > fine as a
> > > > woman
> > > > > (I got over that kind of problem 15 years ago when I saw a
> stage
> > > > production
> > > > > of Romeo and Juliet with Mercutio played by an asian woman),
> > but her
> > > > > tremulous first line left me wondering if she was going to be
> a
> > > strong
> > > > > enough character. She makes up for it later.
> > > > >
> > > > > My only complaint? It's fucking SLOW. Why is it that when you
>
> > have a
> > > TV
> > > > > miniseries it automatically means that it's going to be
> > waaaaaay too
> > > > much
> > > > > exposition? The whole 2 hours was basically initial character
> > > > development.
> > > > > Sure some stuff happened, but it was just to set up the
> second
> > > episode.
> > > > I
> > > > > hope.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:50 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
> > > > >
> > > > > > Details.... some of us are still working.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Mon 12/8/2003 11:15 PM
> > > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > > Cc:
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yay! It doesn't suck! Yay I say!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Kevin
> > > > > > _____
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > _____
> > > > > _____
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
