Yes, I am aware of that.

I am also aware that people who live in abject poverty will do anything to survive and protect themselves and their families. Public executions don''t stop a family from going hungry.

There are entire nations who live by exactly the ideals that you're talking about.  These countries are: Somailia, Afganistan, and Sierra Leone to name a few.

- Matt Small
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Heald, Tim
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:42 AM
  Subject: RE: More Breaking News

  You do know that their wasn't always welfare and minimum wage in this nation
  right?

  I figure that after the first couple of public executions people would stop
  doing that :)

  And yes I do actually support the idea of public executions.

  --
  Timothy Heald
  Web Portfolio Manager
  Overseas Security Advisory Council
  U.S. Department of State
  571.345.2319

  The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
  Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
  opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
  unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:41 AM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: More Breaking News

  If there were no minimum wage law and there was no public welfare then you
  would likely be shot in the street for your wallet and groceries by people
  needing to eat.

  You don't antagonize a hungry dog.

  - Matt Small
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Simon Horwith
    To: CF-Community
    Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:24 AM
    Subject: RE: More Breaking News

    but the idea behind Minimum wage is that it guarantees a standard of
  living
    that, though still at or near poverty level, does help to guarantee
  certain
    basic living standards.   Even then, the minimum wage tends not to keep-up
    with the rise in inflation.  That said, if a higher inflation rate is the
    price we must pay in order to guarantee legal workers a chance at a decent
    life, so be it.

    ~Simon

    Simon Horwith
    CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
    Member of Team Macromedia
    Macromedia Certified Instructor
    Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
    Certified Flash MX Developer
    CFDJList - List Administrator
     http://www.how2cf.com/ <http://www.how2cf.com/>

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
      Sent: 07 January 2004 14:02
      To: CF-Community
      Subject: RE: More Breaking News

      I think two main things have led us through inflation and rising costs.

      1. Coming off of the gold standard, thanx Nixon.

      2. Minimum wage.

      Why in a free market economy should the government dictate what one side
    of
      an open trade should receive?  If a person is willing to work for next
  to
      nothing, should they not be able to?  Also, to return to a place where
  we
      can compete in a world economy as not just a service provider, but an
      industrial base, we need low pay low skill employees.  As long as law
      requires us to meet and exceed basic standards we cannot do so.

      The only other answer would be to severely penalize countries and
    companies
      that don't meet the same requirements that we impose internally.

      We start by exactly matching tariffs imposed by other nations against
  our
      goods.  Add additional tariffs to nations that don't afford their
    employees
      the same minimum standing of living, add even more for nations that
  don't
      have basic human rights.

      It would be painful, maybe even start a war or two, but I think it would
    be
      worth it in the long run.

      --
      Timothy Heald
      Web Portfolio Manager
      Overseas Security Advisory Council
      U.S. Department of State
      571.345.2319

      The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
      Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
      opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail
    is
      unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Simon Horwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
      Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:58 AM
      To: CF-Community
      Subject: RE: More Breaking News

      Hey - I like cutting my own lawn.

      I'm no economist, bu i wouldn't hold your breath on seeing minimum wage
  go
      away.  Quite honestly, as far as I know it shouldn't go away.  The goal
      shouldn't be to do away with it so that companies can hire Americans for
    as
      cheap as they can get illegal labor, but to legalize all of the labor to
    the
      extent that it all falls under minimum wage law.  That way there'd be no
      benefit to hiring an illegal labourer as opposed to a legal one (they'd
    cost
      the same).  Without minimum wage, what would protect the workforce -
      especially unskilled and manual labour?  Of course, this would most
  likely
      result in even more work being outsourced to countries like India... any
      work that can be, anyway.

      ~Simon

      Simon Horwith
      CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
      Member of Team Macromedia
      Macromedia Certified Instructor
      Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
      Certified Flash MX Developer
      CFDJList - List Administrator
      http://www.how2cf.com/ <http://www.how2cf.com/>
  <http://www.how2cf.com/>

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: 07 January 2004 13:36
        To: CF-Community
        Subject: RE: More Breaking News

        >We have 10.5 million illegal workers in the United States right now,"
      said
        US Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue.

        >"If they went home, we'd have to shut down the country."

        Hehe, or we'd just have to learn how to cut our own lawn again.  :)

        Immigration is probably where I am furthest from libertarian.  At this
      point
        I am almost isolationist.  I would much rather see work-fare  programs
      that
        get people off the rolls of welfare and into low and no skill jobs.
      Really
        if we could do away with the minimum wage and make it so that these
        companies that hire illegals because they can't afford Americans, can
      again,
        it would be good for us all.

        Also isn't this going to encourage MORE illegal immigration, as people
      will
        see the "success stories" of people who got legal recognition.  Plus
  the
      way
        many state governments are set up, don't immigrants, even
  non-citizens,
      then
        become eligible for social programs, like welfare and medical
  benefits?

        Yeah I can't see how any of this is a good idea.

        --
        Timothy Heald
        Web Portfolio Manager
        Overseas Security Advisory Council
        U.S. Department of State
        571.345.2319

        The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the
  U.S.
        Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
        opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This
  e-mail
      is
        unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Erika L Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:27 AM
        To: CF-Community
        Subject: More Breaking News

         http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3375327.stm
  <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3375327.stm>
      <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3375327.stm>
        <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3375327.stm>

        Cheers,
        Erika
          _____
        _____
    _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to