and satire are two very basic reasons that fair use exists.
--
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319
The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re:www.mikerowesoft.com domain
if it's a software site? He isn't allowed to be in software because his name
is Mike Rowe? It isn't copyright infringement unless there is a possibility
for confusion. Even if his intention is to tweak M$.
Dana
> True...then there is no need for the work "soft" in the domain name.
>
> Lord help us if M$ gets the idea nobody else can use the word micro...
> leading us to those well-known devices, the wassisphone and the
> wassisscope....
>
> Dana
>
> >I'm not. I just don't like what this guy is up to. This was NOT
> coincidence.
> >
> >
> >--Original Message Text---
> >From: Mark Smyth
> >Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:22:52 -0000
> >
> >they are are a bunch of paranoid freaks
> >
> >
> >how come you're sticking up for them?
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: 21 January 2004 16:06
> >To: CF-Community
> >Subject: RE: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
> >
> >Whats his middle name, "soft".
> >
> >That was not necessary.
> >
> >--Original Message Text---
> >From: Mark Smyth
> >Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:03:36 -0000
> >
> >but his name is Mike Rowe
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: 21 January 2004 16:00
> >To: CF-Community
> >Subject: re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Whats your thoughts on this frigg'in puke in British Columbia CANADA
> trying
> >to monopolize on www.mikerowesoft.com.?
> >
> >To be fair to MS it is copyright infringement.
> >
> >http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/20/rowe.fight/index.
> html
> ><http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/20/rowe.fight/index.
> html>
> ><http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/20/rowe.fight/index.
> html>
> > _____
> > _____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
